Re: ITP: graphviz (and doxygen?)

2003-09-26 Thread Hack Kampbjorn
Jörg Schaible wrote: Hack Kampbjorn wrote on Thursday, September 25, 2003 9:04 PM: Gareth Pearce wrote: For reference: http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/license/index.html http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/download.html I could not find the license under OSD Approved Licen

RE: ITP: graphviz (and doxygen?)

2003-09-26 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi gang, Hack Kampbjorn wrote on Thursday, September 25, 2003 9:04 PM: > Gareth Pearce wrote: >> One thing to note is that in debian it is distributed under non-free. >> So perhaps someone might like to comment on if the license is valid >> for setup.exe distribution. > > If Debian has put it und

RE: ITP: graphviz (and doxygen?)

2003-09-26 Thread Gareth Pearce
> > If Debian has put it under non-free it does not meet Debian's poliy for > main. > > It's problamy not compatible with GPL or the OpenSource Definition > > > > > > For reference: > > > http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/graphviz/license/index.html > > > http://www.research.att.com/sw/tools/gra

Re: ITP: graphviz (and doxygen?)

2003-09-25 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Hack Kampbjorn wrote: > Gareth Pearce wrote: > > One thing to note is that in debian it is distributed under non-free. So > > perhaps someone might like to comment on if the license is valid for > > setup.exe distribution. > > If Debian has put it under non-free it does not m

Re: ITP: graphviz (and doxygen?)

2003-09-25 Thread Hack Kampbjorn
Gareth Pearce wrote: One thing to note is that in debian it is distributed under non-free. So perhaps someone might like to comment on if the license is valid for setup.exe distribution. If Debian has put it under non-free it does not meet Debian's poliy for main. It's problamy not compatible wit

RE: ITP: graphviz and doxygen (seperately)

2003-09-25 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Gareth Pearce wrote: > [snip] > > Anyway... > Was that a vote for graphviz? I've never used doxygen, but graphviz has my vote. Igor -- http://cs.nyu.edu/~pechtcha/ |\ _,,,---,,_[EMAIL PROTECTED] ZZZzz /,`.-'`

RE: ITP: graphviz and doxygen (seperately)

2003-09-25 Thread Jörg Schaible
Gareth Pearce wrote on Thursday, September 25, 2003 6:45 PM: > Well I was never intending to put them in one - separate > original source tar.gz's files - so putting them together > would be crazy. > > I am thinking of putting doxygen documentation in a separate package. Fine with me. > I don't

RE: ITP: graphviz and doxygen (seperately)

2003-09-25 Thread Gareth Pearce
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Jörg Schaible > Sent: Friday, 26 September 2003 2:33 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: graphviz (and doxygen?) > > Hi Gareth, > > Gareth Pearce wrote on Thursday, September 25, 2003 6:18 PM: