Well baby, here's a pacifier.
Suck it.
Harold
> -Original Message-
> From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 6:17 PM
> To: Harold L Hunt II
> Subject: Re: ITP: profile
>
>
> Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> >
&g
OT!
Please stop the thread about reply. It wasn't even intended for Ernie!
*Please* comment about the profile package. Both I and Rob want to
get this rolling.
J.
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 23:03, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Oops, clicked the wrong message. The ones I have been testing over the
> last few days all had the reply-to set :)
>
> I had been testing messages from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I thought that
> one had the reply-to set as well... was I again
Earnie Boyd wrote:
> Harold L Hunt II wrote:
>
>>Earnie,
>>
>>The reply-to address for the mailing list is now [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>
>
> Yes, I set it that way myself.
>
>
>>In light of this, maybe you should reevaluate whether your default
>>action should be to hit ``reply'' or ``reply-to-a
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
>
> Earnie,
>
> The reply-to address for the mailing list is now [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Yes, I set it that way myself.
> In light of this, maybe you should reevaluate whether your default
> action should be to hit ``reply'' or ``reply-to-all''.
>
I will not be adjusting
Robert Collins wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 22:55, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
>
>
>>Earnie,
>>
>>The reply-to address for the mailing list is now [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>In light of this, maybe you should reevaluate whether your default
>>action should be to hit ``reply'' or ``reply-to-all''.
>
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 08:46:59AM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> In response to this email I hit Reply-All. If you don't set Reply-To
> then this email is sent to you in response and the list is CCed. I and
> others don't adjust the distribution as I/we can't remember the names of
> the 1000's of
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 22:55, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Earnie,
>
> The reply-to address for the mailing list is now [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> In light of this, maybe you should reevaluate whether your default
> action should be to hit ``reply'' or ``reply-to-all''.
It doesn't appear to be. I thou
Earnie Boyd wrote:
> John Morrison wrote:
>
(PS, I'm subscribed ;)
>>>
>>>By this I assume you to mean that you don't need to be listed in the
>>>distribution. You need to set the Reply-To header if you want that to
>>>happen. See the archives of many lists for explanations.
>>
>>No, I mean
John Morrison wrote:
>
> > > (PS, I'm subscribed ;)
> >
> > By this I assume you to mean that you don't need to be listed in the
> > distribution. You need to set the Reply-To header if you want that to
> > happen. See the archives of many lists for explanations.
>
> No, I mean I keep getting
> > (PS, I'm subscribed ;)
>
> By this I assume you to mean that you don't need to be listed in the
> distribution. You need to set the Reply-To header if you want that to
> happen. See the archives of many lists for explanations.
No, I mean I keep getting two copies of every email :) I don't
John Morrison wrote:
>
> Hi Gerrit :)
>
> > From: Gerrit P. Haase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Hallo John,
> >
> > Am Sonntag, 28. Juli 2002 um 17:13 schriebst du:
> >
> > > I also don't know how to indicate to the user that this package has
> > > changed. Should it copy the current profile t
Hi Gerrit :)
> From: Gerrit P. Haase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Hallo John,
>
> Am Sonntag, 28. Juli 2002 um 17:13 schriebst du:
>
> > I also don't know how to indicate to the user that this package has
> > changed. Should it copy the current profile to, for example,
> > profile-old-`date`?
Hallo John,
Am Sonntag, 28. Juli 2002 um 17:13 schriebst du:
> I also don't know how to indicate to the user that this package has
> changed. Should it copy the current profile to, for example,
> profile-old-`date`? Should it do anything at all?
If the current /etc/profile is removed then the
> From: Gerrit P. Haase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Hallo John,
>
> Am Sonntag, 28. Juli 2002 um 13:18 schriebst du:
>
> > After (much ;) discussion with Rob here's the first 'release' of the
> > profile package.
>
> > If anyone want's to suggest modifications for these files, for example
> > DIR
Hallo John,
Am Sonntag, 28. Juli 2002 um 13:18 schriebst du:
> After (much ;) discussion with Rob here's the first 'release' of the
> profile package.
> If anyone want's to suggest modifications for these files, for example
> DIR_COLOR, key binding..., please send a message (and patch ;) to the
On Sun, 2002-07-28 at 21:18, John Morrison wrote:
> After (much ;) discussion with Rob here's the first 'release' of the
> profile package.
I'm for inclusion of these packages - they allow setup to become
somewhat simpler.
Thanks John!
Rob
msg03505/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
17 matches
Mail list logo
