RE: New Cygwin package? (fwd)

2002-07-10 Thread Robert Collins
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joseph S. Testa > Sent: Wednesday, 10 July 2002 11:19 PM > To: Robert Collins > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: New Cygwin package? (fwd) > > > > The only r

Re: New Cygwin package? (fwd)

2002-07-10 Thread Nicholas Wourms
Robert Collins wrote: >I quite like the concept of a GUI for sftp, and as it uses cygwin1.dll, >it's definitely in the right line of software to be an inclusion >candidate. The only reservation I have is that IIRC it is (or was) built >with Delphi, which means that whilst it may be licenced in an

RE: New Cygwin package? (fwd)

2002-07-10 Thread Morrison, John
(Sorry Robert - ment to send to list!) Just pulled the source - looks like C++ to me :) J. > From: Robert Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > I quite like the concept of a GUI for sftp, and as it uses > cygwin1.dll, > it's definitely in the right line of software to be an inclusion > candi

RE: New Cygwin package? (fwd)

2002-07-10 Thread Joseph S. Testa
> The only reservation I have is that IIRC it is (or was) built > with Delphi, which means that whilst it may be licenced in an open > source manner, it can't be -used- in an open source manner because one > has to buy Delphi to compile it. Actually, its written 100% in Borland C++ (and always wa

RE: New Cygwin package? (fwd)

2002-07-10 Thread Robert Collins
I quite like the concept of a GUI for sftp, and as it uses cygwin1.dll, it's definitely in the right line of software to be an inclusion candidate. The only reservation I have is that IIRC it is (or was) built with Delphi, which means that whilst it may be licenced in an open source manner, it can