Re: New GMP and MPFR packages for review

2006-11-09 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 9 09:02, Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS) wrote: From: Corinna Vinschen I'm not using this so I can't test. The packaging looks good. But I don't think the gmp package should have libgmp-devel in its requirements. This contradicts the purpose of differing between runtime

RE: New GMP and MPFR packages for review

2006-11-08 Thread Billinghurst, David \(CALCRTS\)
From: Corinna Vinschen I'm not using this so I can't test. The packaging looks good. But I don't think the gmp package should have libgmp-devel in its requirements. This contradicts the purpose of differing between runtime and devel packages. The devel package should only be

Re: New GMP and MPFR packages for review

2006-11-07 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Nov 6 14:13, Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS) wrote: http://billinghurst.customer.netspace.net.au/cygwin/gmp/gmp-4.2.1-1-src.tar.bz2 http://billinghurst.customer.netspace.net.au/cygwin/gmp/gmp-4.2.1-1.tar.bz2 http://billinghurst.customer.netspace.net.au/cygwin/gmp/setup.hint