Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 04:43:38PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
We REALLY need to get setup fixed. Is there any hope that you
are close to getting this fixed, Max?
I've finally managed to reproduce it! (today)
Let's see what tonight's debugging brin
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 04:43:38PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>We REALLY need to get setup fixed. Is there any hope that you
>>are close to getting this fixed, Max?
>
>I've finally managed to reproduce it! (today)
>
>Let's see what tonight's debugging brings to light.
W
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Dec 22 15:49, Max Bowsher wrote:
Reini Urban wrote:
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
We REALLY need to get setup fixed. Is there any hope that you
are close to getting this fixed, Max?
Why not get rid of the complicated tar => bz2 stack and just check for
".tar.bz2" and use a
Christopher Faylor wrote:
We REALLY need to get setup fixed. Is there any hope that you
are close to getting this fixed, Max?
I've finally managed to reproduce it! (today)
Let's see what tonight's debugging brings to light.
Max.
On Dec 22 15:49, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Reini Urban wrote:
> >Christopher Faylor schrieb:
> >>We REALLY need to get setup fixed. Is there any hope that you
> >>are close to getting this fixed, Max?
> >
> >Why not get rid of the complicated tar => bz2 stack and just check for
> >".tar.bz2" and use a
Reini Urban wrote:
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
We REALLY need to get setup fixed. Is there any hope that you
are close to getting this fixed, Max?
Why not get rid of the complicated tar => bz2 stack and just check for
".tar.bz2" and use a simplified approach then, which makes sure that the
tar or
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Rajesh Balakrishnan wrote:
> Since postinstall seemed to be a candidate for the hang,
> I'm wondering if we could tap at the following code in script.cc
>
> In run(), there is an infinite wait
> WaitForSingleObject (pi.hProcess, INFINITE);
>
> Should we use a wait period
--- Reini Urban <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Christopher Faylor schrieb:
> > We REALLY need to get setup fixed. Is there any hope that you
> > are close to getting this fixed, Max?
>
> Why not get rid of the complicated tar => bz2 stack and just check for
> ".tar.bz2" and use a simplified appro
> From: Reini Urban
> Christopher Faylor schrieb:
> > We REALLY need to get setup fixed. Is there any hope that you
> > are close to getting this fixed, Max?
>
> Why not get rid of the complicated tar => bz2 stack and just
> check for
> ".tar.bz2" and use a simplified approach then, which makes
Christopher Faylor schrieb:
We REALLY need to get setup fixed. Is there any hope that you
are close to getting this fixed, Max?
Why not get rid of the complicated tar => bz2 stack and just check for
".tar.bz2" and use a simplified approach then, which makes sure that the
tar or bz2 part gets pro
10 matches
Mail list logo