[snip]
> > Gary,
> >
> > any timeframe for the -2 version?
>
> Gary? Are you on vacation or aren't you interested in mutt maintainership
> anymore?
Vacation, I wish! ;-) No, just ridiculously busy.
> It's 4 weeks now since you got the patch from Pierre and the
> latest mutt still doesn't wor
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 10:05:23AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 02:13:43PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> > > The latest mutt (has it been announced?)
> >
> > Not yet, no. I have to apologize, I've been busy getting my brother married. I
> > shall do so post-haste
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 02:13:43PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> > The latest mutt (has it been announced?)
>
> Not yet, no. I have to apologize, I've been busy getting my brother married. I
> shall do so post-haste.
>
> > does not seems to
> > contain the patch discussed in
> >
> > http:/
> The latest mutt (has it been announced?)
Not yet, no. I have to apologize, I've been busy getting my brother married. I
shall do so post-haste.
> does not seems to
> contain the patch discussed in
>
> http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-02/msg01148.html
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-11/
The latest mutt (has it been announced?) does not seems to
contain the patch discussed in
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-02/msg01148.html
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-11/msg00628.html
and repeated below. Consequently it doesn't work on Win9x/ME.
Pierre
--- dotlock.c.orig 2003-10
On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 07:04:19AM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> "breaking a fly on a..."??? ;-) Well, yeah, but what about the "Be sure that
> if you would overwrite an already present file that the user is offered the
> choice of keeping their own or overwriting with your defaults." part?
[snip]
>
> One thing I did note was how much larger mutt-1.4.1-1-src.tar.bz2 is than
> mutt-1.4-1-src.tar.bz2 (jump from 1.6MB to 2.5MB). The 1.4-1-src package
> included the individual source files while 1.4.1-1-src includes a .tar.gz of
> the source files inside the .tar.bz2. I guess there is som
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 02:17:44PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> > Maybe a sample postinstall
> > script too.
>
> A sample postinstall script for something like this?
>
> #!/bin/sh
> if [ ! -f "/etc/Muttrc" ]
> then
> cp /etc/defaults/etc/Muttrc /etc
> fi
> if [ ! -f "/etc/mi
On 2003-10-13T14:17-0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
) > On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 12:31:47AM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
) > > Yes, it's true: Mutt's been updated again:
) > >
) > > http://home.att.net/~g.r.vansickle/cygwin/mutt/setup.hint
) > > http://home.att.net/~g.r.vansickle/cygwin/mutt/mut
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 02:17:44PM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> Maybe a sample postinstall
> script too.
A sample postinstall script for something like this?
#!/bin/sh
if [ ! -f "/etc/Muttrc" ]
then
cp /etc/defaults/etc/Muttrc /etc
fi
if [ ! -f "/etc/mime.types" ]
then
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 12:31:47AM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> > Yes, it's true: Mutt's been updated again:
> >
> > http://home.att.net/~g.r.vansickle/cygwin/mutt/setup.hint
> > http://home.att.net/~g.r.vansickle/cygwin/mutt/mutt-1.4.1-1.tar.bz2
> > http://home.att.net/~g.r.vansickle/cygwi
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 12:31:47AM -0500, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> Yes, it's true: Mutt's been updated again:
>
> http://home.att.net/~g.r.vansickle/cygwin/mutt/setup.hint
> http://home.att.net/~g.r.vansickle/cygwin/mutt/mutt-1.4.1-1.tar.bz2
> http://home.att.net/~g.r.vansickle/cygwin/mutt/mutt
12 matches
Mail list logo
