Re: binutils status?

2002-06-02 Thread Nicholas Wourms
Hi, It was stated earlier that Ralf's "unused _nm_ symbols" patch would be used. What is the story on this? For a refresher: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-05/msg00320.html Cheers, Nicholas Charles Wilson wrote: > Christopher Faylor wrote: > >> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 03:24:47

Re: binutils status?

2002-05-30 Thread Charles Wilson
Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 03:24:47PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > >>Any comments here? Should I submit this patch to binutils, or can we >>agree and commit from here? > > > Submit it to binutils, please. done. --Chuck

Re: binutils status?

2002-05-30 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 03:24:47PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >Any comments here? Should I submit this patch to binutils, or can we >agree and commit from here? Submit it to binutils, please. cgf

Re: binutils status?

2002-05-30 Thread Charles Wilson
Any comments here? Should I submit this patch to binutils, or can we agree and commit from here? --Chuck Charles Wilson wrote: > Danny Smith wrote: > > >>> I think we should keep the warnings if --auto-import isn't specified > >>> on the command line but get rid of them if it is explictl

RE: binutils status ?

2002-05-30 Thread Ralf Habacker
> On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 11:50:20PM +0200, Ralf Habacker wrote: > >If have tested this patch with my cygin /bin dir (345 files) and rebinded kde > >2.2.2 dll's and exes (335 files) and have got no problems with > printing import > >tables. > > > >2002-05-23 Ralf Habacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >

Re: binutils status ?

2002-05-29 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 11:50:20PM +0200, Ralf Habacker wrote: >If have tested this patch with my cygin /bin dir (345 files) and rebinded kde >2.2.2 dll's and exes (335 files) and have got no problems with printing import >tables. > >2002-05-23 Ralf Habacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * peXXi

RE: binutils status ?

2002-05-23 Thread Ralf Habacker
> > > 3) Ralf's patch for "objdump/cygwin crashes on auto-imported libs" > > > > > This patch does not help in this case. I will inspect this and supply > > a updated > > patch. > > Appended is a patch for ... see the ChangeLog entry. If have tested this patch with my cygin /bin dir (345 files

RE: binutils status ?

2002-05-23 Thread Ralf Habacker
Relating to this patch for peXXigen.c bfd/peXXigen.c: >date: 2002/05/15 15:28:12; author: nickc; state: Exp; lines: +54 -3 >Do not assume that the first thunk is located in the same section as the >import table. Instead check, and if necessary load the section containing >the thunk. I have

RE: binutils status ?

2002-05-21 Thread Ralf Habacker
> > 3) Ralf's patch for "objdump/cygwin crashes on auto-imported libs" > > > > Nick Clifton has applied a patch for a similar problem, I will look if this > > solve this already. > > I was wrong, it was Laurent Pinchart, who has applied this patch. > This patch does not help in this case. I will

RE: binutils status

2002-05-21 Thread Ralf Habacker
> 3) Ralf's patch for "objdump/cygwin crashes on auto-imported libs" > > Nick Clifton has applied a patch for a similar problem, I will look if this > solve this already. > This patch does not help in this case. I will inspect this and supply a updated patch. Ralf

Re: binutils status?

2002-05-20 Thread Charles Wilson
Danny Smith wrote: >>> I think we should keep the warnings if --auto-import isn't specified >>> on the command line but get rid of them if it is explictly >>> specified. Including --auto-import on the command line would >>> indicate that the user knows what they're doing, so they don't

RE: binutils status?

2002-05-20 Thread Danny Smith
--- Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:07 AM > > > Since --auto-import has been the default for the last version > > of binutils, I think we should leave it tha

Re: binutils status?

2002-05-20 Thread David A. Cobb
Charles Wilson wrote: > Danny Smith wrote: > I'd say go ahead and turn on auto-import in CVS and remove the >>> warning, >>> >> I disagree that is a good idea. > > > Two ideas: > 1) making auto-import the default > 2) turning off the warnings > > You appear to not like either one. I d

RE: binutils status

2002-05-20 Thread Ralf Habacker
> 1) Ralf's "removing unused _nm_ symbol exports" fix Relating to the thread http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-04/msg00433.html i've updated this patch to the latest cvs release. -- 2002-04-25 Ralf Ha

RE: binutils status?

2002-05-20 Thread Robert Collins
> -Original Message- > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:07 AM > Since --auto-import has been the default for the last version > of binutils, I think we should leave it that way. Yes. > I think we should keep the warnings if --auto-

Re: binutils status?

2002-05-20 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 09:43:40PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 6:44 PM > >> Two ideas: >> 1) making auto-import the default >> 2) turning off the warnings >> >> You appear to not l

RE: binutils status?

2002-05-20 Thread Robert Collins
> -Original Message- > From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 6:44 PM > Two ideas: > 1) making auto-import the default > 2) turning off the warnings > > You appear to not like either one. I don't really care about the > warnings, but the auto-im

Re: binutils status?

2002-05-20 Thread Charles Wilson
Danny Smith wrote: >>>I'd say go ahead and turn on auto-import in CVS and remove the >>> >>warning, >> >>>Chuck. I've gotten approval from Nick Clifton to do this if we >>> >>agree >> >>>it's a good idea. >>> >>>It's obviously a good idea. >>> > > I disagree that is a good idea. Two ideas: 1

Re: binutils status?

2002-05-20 Thread Danny Smith
--- Charles Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 12:50:46AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > > > >>1) Ralf's "removing unused _nm_ symbol exports" fix > >>2) Danny's (or Ralf's?) export-list fix (where whole static > archives can > >>b

Re: binutils status?

2002-05-19 Thread Charles Wilson
Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 12:50:46AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: > >>1) Ralf's "removing unused _nm_ symbol exports" fix >>2) Danny's (or Ralf's?) export-list fix (where whole static archives can >>be marked for non-export, or DO export...helpful for convenience lib

Re: binutils status?

2002-05-19 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 12:50:46AM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote: >1) Ralf's "removing unused _nm_ symbol exports" fix >2) Danny's (or Ralf's?) export-list fix (where whole static archives can >be marked for non-export, or DO export...helpful for convenience libs) >3) Ralf's patch for "objdump/cygw

Re: binutils status?

2002-05-19 Thread Charles Wilson
Christopher Faylor wrote: > I lost track. Should I make a new release or are we waiting for > something new to be added? > > I just rebuilt binutils and made --auto-import the default. Is there > a compelling reason for not doing this in the next release? I know that > --auto-import isn't per