On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
On 9/27/05, Brian Ford wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Please go back to bzipping the manpages like they have been in previous
packages.
I see now that this was the case.
However, the source package that Harold gave
On 9/27/05, Brian Ford wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Nicholas,
You have been around here long enough to know that personal email is not
the way to address these issues. As such, I have forwarded this reply to
the proper mailing list and set the Reply To appropriately.
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Nicholas,
You have been around here long enough to know that personal email is not
the way to address these issues. As such, I have forwarded this reply to
the proper mailing list and set the Reply To appropriately. Please honor
this. The lack of
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 09:15:27AM -0500, Brian Ford wrote:
Is there any general consensus on either of these two points? ie:
1.) bziping vs gziping man pages.
Maybe I'm missing something but I don't see any bzip2'ed man pages in my
/usr/share/man.
2.) When to package static libs too.
I'd say
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 09:15:27AM -0500, Brian Ford wrote:
Is there any general consensus on either of these two points? ie:
1.) bziping vs gziping man pages.
Maybe I'm missing something but I don't see any bzip2'ed man pages in my
/usr/share/man.
$ find $(IFS=:; echo `manpath`) -name
Original Message
From: Brian Ford
Sent: 15 September 2005 23:20
I am confused, though. The crash you presented to me was one of not being
able to start nedit at all:
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 17:09:32 -0700
From: Harold L Hunt
To: Brian.Ford
Subject: Re: lesstif update request
To: Brian.Ford
Subject: Re: lesstif update request
Nope, 0.94.4 doesn't work with nedit:
---
nedit.exe - Application Error
---
The application failed to initialize properly (0xc005). Click on OK
to terminate the application
Subject: Re: lesstif update request
Nope, 0.94.4 doesn't work with nedit:
---
nedit.exe - Application Error
---
The application failed to initialize properly (0xc005). Click on OK
to terminate the application.
That was the binutils relocs
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Hold up... am I not reading something correctly? Was the binutils
change that caused the problem ever reverted?
IIRC, it was a gcc change that caused the problem. Although, there may
have been a binutils work around.
If not, the problem will
Brian,
Brian Ford wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Brian Ford wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
[snip]
That's pretty much why the lesstif package is stuck where it is: it
didn't work with nedit.
We must have a mis-communication here.
I told you
10 matches
Mail list logo