Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Jari Aalto+list.cygwin-apps wrote: > > 'minires' is ready for review. It's GPL. Download page at > > http://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/pc/gnuwin32/cygwin/porters/Humblet_Pierre_A/V1.1/ > > > The "make install" script makes a backup of last unison version, > that's why two .exe fi

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Jari Aalto+list.cygwin-apps wrote: > > > > > 'minires' is ready for review. It's GPL. Download page at > > > > http://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/pc/gnuwin32/cygwin/porters/Humblet_Pierre_A/V1.1/ > > > > > > The "make install" script m

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

* Wed 2003-06-11 Elfyn McBratney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> list.cygwin-apps * Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> 'minires' is ready for review. It's GPL. Download page at >> >> http://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/pc/gnuwin32/cygwin/porters/Humblet_Pierre_A/V1.1/ >> >> >> The "make install" script makes a b

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote: On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Jari Aalto+list.cygwin-apps wrote: 'minires' is ready for review. It's GPL. Download page at http://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/pc/gnuwin32/cygwin/porters/Humblet_Pierre_A/V1.1/ The "make install" script mak

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:33:36PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote: >Now as to whether it should be spun as a separate dll/import library >(-lresolv), is another matter, entirely. Of course, feel free to >disagree, as I could be wrong ;-). I think it belongs in newlib, too. Anyone willing to take a

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

At 10:33 PM 6/11/2003 -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote: > >Is there any reason why this cannot be put in the cygwin (or newlib) >source tree? AFAICT, Pierre used BSD licensed source code as a basis >for his work, so it wouldn't violate RedHat's licensing if Pierre gave >his ok. This is definitely

RE: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

opher Faylor Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 11:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:33:36PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote: >Now as to whether it should be spun as a separate dll/import library >(-lresolv), is ano

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 09:51:46PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Jari Aalto+list.cygwin-apps wrote: > > > > > 'minires' is ready for review. It's GPL. Download page at > > > > http://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/pc/gnuwin32/cygwin/porters/Humblet_Pierre_A/V1.1/ > > > > > > The "m

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 03:21:26AM +0300, Jari Aalto+list.cygwin-apps wrote: > Fixed. New build round now at: > > http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/minires/minires-0.95-1-src.tar.bz2 > http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/minires/minires-0.95-1.tar.bz2 Wget worked fine so I could download the pack

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 03:21:26AM +0300, Jari Aalto+list.cygwin-apps wrote: >> Fixed. New build round now at: >> >> http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/minires/minires-0.95-1-src.tar.bz2 >> http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/minires/minires-0.95-1.tar.bz2 > > Wget worked f

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:33:36PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote: > >Now as to whether it should be spun as a separate dll/import library > >(-lresolv), is another matter, entirely. Of course, feel free to > >disagree, as I could be wrong ;-). > > I think it belongs

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 11:49:28AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:33:36PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote: > > >Now as to whether it should be spun as a separate dll/import library > > >(-lresolv), is another matter, entirely. Of course

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 11:49:28AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:33:36PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote: > > > >Now as to whether it should be spun as a separate dll/import library > > > >(-lresolv), i

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 06:51:46AM -0400, Sergey Okhapkin wrote: >libresolv is a standalone library on many unixes, for example BIND >installs this lib. I see no reason to include the library into newlib, >let's keep it standalone. newlib has standalone libraries now. Putting it in newlib gets it

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 11:49:28AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:33:36PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote: >> >Now as to whether it should be spun as a separate dll/import library >> >(-lresolv), is another matter, entirely. Of course, fee

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 06:51:46AM -0400, Sergey Okhapkin wrote: libresolv is a standalone library on many unixes, for example BIND installs this lib. I see no reason to include the library into newlib, let's keep it standalone. newlib has standalone libraries now. Putt

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Nicholas Wourms wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 06:51:46AM -0400, Sergey Okhapkin wrote: > > > >>libresolv is a standalone library on many unixes, for example BIND > >>installs this lib. I see no reason to include the library into newlib, > >>let'

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 08:56:38PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: >There's two approaches that's been mentioned: > > 1) Have minires as a stand-alone package or a package that cygwin depends on > >or > > 2) Move minires into winsup/resolv 3) Move minires into newlib cgf

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Thu, 12 Jun 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 08:56:38PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > >There's two approaches that's been mentioned: > > > > 1) Have minires as a stand-alone package or a package that cygwin depends on > > > >or > > > > 2) Move minires into winsup/re

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 01:20:21PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > It works on my antique Win95 and on my CYGWIN_NT-4.0. There the Windows > functions return an error and minires falls back to resolv.conf > Of course LoadLibrary/GetProcAddres would work too. Personally

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 01:20:21PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: It works on my antique Win95 and on my CYGWIN_NT-4.0. There the Windows functions return an error and minires falls back to resolv.conf Of course LoadLibrary/GetProcAddres would work

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 01:20:21PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > [snip] > > I have recently noticed that the information is in fact available > > from the registry, but getting to it is not straightforward > > (same kind of indirect lookups as in

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 12:13:24PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > I had the funny idea to drop the whole Windows specific part and > > instead create /etc/resolve.conf in the postinstall script from > > the output of `ipconfig /all'. That would w

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 12:13:24PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > I had the funny idea to drop the whole Windows specific part and > > > instead create /etc/resolve.conf in the postinstall script

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 01:20:21PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > > [snip] > > > I have recently noticed that the information is in fact available > > > from the registry, but getting to it is not straightforward >

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 01:54:12PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > Is there a prefered source for the system header files? > Currently they come from bind 9.2.1. For some reason the > function names are redefined to add an initial "_". > This causes some configure scripts (those omitting to > i

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

Minires-0.96 is now available on As requested for possible inclusion in newlib, it now loads Windows dll dynamically (instead of linking). The cygwin specific part of the package has been iso

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > Can someone take over and do whatever is necessary to > put it in newlib, as discussed last month? I am not sure > what this really involves. > Elfyn has already proposed to help, :) > > but he

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

Hi Pierre, On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 07:59:03PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > > > Can someone take over and do whatever is necessary to > > put it in newlib, as discussed last month? I am not sure > > what this really involves. > > Elfyn has already

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

At 10:12 PM 10/11/2003 +0200, you wrote: >Hi Pierre, > >On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 07:59:03PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: >> On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >> >> > Can someone take over and do whatever is necessary to >> > put it in newlib, as discussed last month? I am not sure >> >

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

At 10:12 PM 10/11/2003 +0200, you wrote: >Hi Pierre, > >On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 07:59:03PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: >> On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >> >> > Can someone take over and do whatever is necessary to >> > put it in newlib, as discussed last month? I am not sure >> >

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 05:39:04PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > At 10:12 PM 10/11/2003 +0200, you wrote: > >Hi Pierre, > > > >On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 07:59:03PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > >> On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > >> > >> > Can someone take over and do whatever i

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

At 04:35 PM 11/18/2003 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 05:39:04PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >> At 10:12 PM 10/11/2003 +0200, you wrote: >> > >> >since Elfyn has left us, would you mind to refresh the ITP for minres >> >for inclusion in the Cygwin distro? IMHO, having

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:43:45PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > At 04:35 PM 11/18/2003 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Unfortunately, with the given GPL license it wouldn't > >be possible to be put into newlib nor into Cygwin directly. Did we > >straighten that out already? I don't remem

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:18:04AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:43:45PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > > Review? Vote? > > Review: The only problem I found was the naming of the source package. > It's missing the -1 and the source directory within is missing the -

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:18:04AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:43:45PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > > > Review? Vote? > > > > Review: The only problem I found was the naming of the source package. > > It's missing the -1 and the so

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 09:20:40AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Oh, btw., why does minires export the symbols with leading underscores? > > Because minires is using include files from bind, and bind does it for > reasons I don't > know (older binds don't do it). Th

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 09:20:40AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > Oh, btw., why does minires export the symbols with leading underscores? > > > > Because minires is using include files from bind, and bind does it for > > reasons I don'

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 01:23:05PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > Does linux use a recent bind adding underscores (grep res_query resolv.h)? Yes. > Does OpenSSH's configure behave OK there? If so, why? Apparently, on Linux the shared lib libresolve.so defines not only a text symbol __res_quer

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 01:23:05PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: Does linux use a recent bind adding underscores (grep res_query resolv.h)? Yes. Does OpenSSH's configure behave OK there? If so, why? Apparently, on Linux the shared lib libresolve.so defines not only

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 01:23:05PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > > Does linux use a recent bind adding underscores (grep res_query resolv.h)? > > Yes. > > > Does OpenSSH's configure behave OK there? If so, why? > > Apparently, on Linux the shared lib libresolve

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

Nicholas Wourms wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Does ld on Cygwin support weak symbols? Or is it possible to > > define __imp__res_query additionally to __impres_query? > > No, the current pe bfd doesn't support the weak attribute. I believe > only elf targets support it at this

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

Pierre Humblet wrote: Nicholas Wourms wrote: [snip] However, the kludge I use to get around this is to just do this in the source file: #define foo __foo int __foo { } Or you can use a typedef if your symbol is a struct or similar. I am not sure if this addresses the problem at hand. There

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

Pierre Humblet wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: [SNIP] Btw, could cygwin use weak symbols instead of newsym? I suspect this would take quite a bit of doing. In addition to being aliases, weak symbols are also supposed to be "weak". That is, if locally controlled source redefines the symbol, t

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

Nicholas Wourms wrote: > > > I am not sure if this addresses the problem at hand. > > There IS and include file with #define foo __foo > > but configure runs in a problem when it calls foo() without including > > said include file. Thus we would like to have both __foo and foo. > > Noo, yo

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:26:24PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Does ld on Cygwin support weak symbols? Or is it possible to > > define __imp__res_query additionally to __impres_query? > > Very interesting, thanks. > Apparently ld can do it, either with a DEF

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 04:57:24PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > > > Nicholas Wourms wrote: > > > > > > I am not sure if this addresses the problem at hand. > > > There IS and include file with #define foo __foo > > > but configure runs in a problem when it calls foo() without including > >

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

Pierre Humblet wrote: Nicholas Wourms wrote: I am not sure if this addresses the problem at hand. There IS and include file with #define foo __foo but configure runs in a problem when it calls foo() without including said include file. Thus we would like to have both __foo and foo. Noo, you

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

At 10:18 AM 11/19/2003 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >Review: The only problem I found was the naming of the source package. >It's missing the -1 and the source directory within is missing the -1, >too. OK, I think everything is taken care of. The openssh configure might even work OK now (let

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review

On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 09:27:18PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > OK, I think everything is taken care of. The openssh configure > might even work OK now (let me know), YEP! I'm happy :-) > but not with the static library. That's fine. As I wrote, the same goes for Linux. > http://mysite.

Re: minires-0.95 - a new package ready for review (packaging fixed)

* Wed 2003-06-11 Elfyn McBratney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> list.cygwin-apps * Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Jari Aalto+list.cygwin-apps wrote: >> >> 'minires' is ready for review. It's GPL. Download page at >> >> http://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/pc/gnuwin32/cygwin/porters/Humblet_P