Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not that this is a major problem, but could be a wasted 40MB
download for someone not paying attention.
Thanks for the report. It looks like some strange mixup has happened.
In my original packaging, it correctly says:
10:13:28
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 04:24:49PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Hi,
What's the status of the texmf packages? I expected to probably get
some comment on the hint files (Corinna said they seemed ok, but
didn't know too much about TeX), or some other suggestions for the
packages; and
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 01:12:21PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As per Jerome's suggestion you should add the test markers to
your hint files and when you ping that you're ready, I'll upload
them, ok?
Ok thanks. I've added the test
Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks. I've loaded it up to cygwin.com. Please prepare an
announcement according to http://cygwin.com/setup.html#submitting,
point 9. Please wait some hours until at least a few mirrors
had a chance to get the package.
All done (that includes
Jérôme-Georges-Michel BENOIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have just checked the texmf-* tarballs:
Ok, thanks.
in the directory 'usr/doc' the subdirectory `cygwin' is `cygwin' but
not `Cygwin' (the first charactere is a lower case).
Hmm, strange. It looks ok here:
tar tjf
I tried this out (in the context of LilyPond, which I was not familiar
with, but which looks like a great tool! kudos for making this available
via cygwin!!!).
I found that the setup process for texmf-base created a file
(/usr/share/texmf/web2c/pdftex.fmt) with less-than-optimal permissions.
The
