Re: ITP: mksh-R39c-1

2010-04-30 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 27 19:48, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > On 26 April 2010 12:24, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > > > > Is this package GTG now? > > I believe all the loose ends have been tied up in terms of this > package. Is there anything else that needs to be addressed? Doesn't seem so. Uploaded. Thanks, Corinn

Re: ITP: mksh-R39c-1

2010-04-27 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
On 26 April 2010 12:24, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > > Is this package GTG now? I believe all the loose ends have been tied up in terms of this package. Is there anything else that needs to be addressed? Chris -- Chris Sutcliffe http://emergedesktop.org http://www.google.com/profiles/ir0nh34d

Re: ITP: mksh-R39c-1

2010-04-26 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2010-04-26 11:24, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: Ah, 'test' isn't listed as a valid command for cygport... good to know, thank you! The following changes since commit 893c667694cca21efd32bb841fb5815763a85c7d: Yaakov Selkowitz (1): cygport 0.9.82 are available in the git repository at:

Re: ITP: mksh-R39c-1

2010-04-26 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
On 26 April 2010 12:13, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On 2010-04-26 07:02, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> >> I'm curious though, when does: >> >>> src_test() { >>>  cd ${B} >>>  ./test.sh >>> } >> >> get called?  I never saw it run as part of the cygport process. > > cygport mksh-39c-1.cygport test Ah, 't

Re: ITP: mksh-R39c-1

2010-04-26 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2010-04-26 07:02, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: I'm curious though, when does: src_test() { cd ${B} ./test.sh } get called? I never saw it run as part of the cygport process. cygport mksh-39c-1.cygport test Yaakov

Re: ITP: mksh-R39c-1

2010-04-26 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
Thank you for the review Yaakov! I've made all the changes you recommended and I've uploaded the new files: --- wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=3 \ http://emergedesktop.org/cygwin/mksh/mksh-39c-1.tar.bz2 \ http://emergedesktop.org/cygwin/mksh/mksh-39c-1-src.tar.bz2 \ http://emergedesktop.org/cygwin/mksh/

Re: ITP: mksh-R39c-1

2010-04-25 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2010-04-25 16:25, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: With the latest cygport release (0.9.82) now supporting .cpio.gz archives, I've repackaged mksh using the latest cygport. SRC_URI="https://www.mirbsd.org/MirOS/dist/mir/mksh/${P}.cpio.gz"; Your package version ("PV" in cygport terms) ends up being

Re: ITP: mksh-R39c-1

2010-04-25 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
>> Ok, but you do have two shared libraries there which should be >> referenced right? > > Fair enough, I've updated the setup.hint accordingly: With the latest cygport release (0.9.82) now supporting .cpio.gz archives, I've repackaged mksh using the latest cygport. The updated files are availab

Re: ITP: mksh-R39c-1

2010-04-23 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
On 23 April 2010 10:47, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > Ok, but you do have two shared libraries there which should be > referenced right? Fair enough, I've updated the setup.hint accordingly: --- wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=3 \ http://emergedesktop.org/cygwin/mksh/mksh-R39c-1.tar.bz2 \ http://emergede

Re: ITP: mksh-R39c-1

2010-04-23 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:37:13AM -0400, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >On 23 April 2010 10:11, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:09:46AM -0400, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >> >>Doesn't mksh uses ncurses for command line editing and recall? ?It >>isn't listed as a dependency. > >Using t

Re: ITP: mksh-R39c-1

2010-04-23 Thread Chris Sutcliffe
On 23 April 2010 10:11, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:09:46AM -0400, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: > > Doesn't mksh uses ncurses for command line editing and recall?  It > isn't listed as a dependency. Using the Build.sh script supplied by mksh it does not link against the share

Re: ITP: mksh-R39c-1

2010-04-23 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 09:09:46AM -0400, Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >Hi All, > >Given that pdksh has abandoned, I'm proposing to add mksh as a >replacement. I realize that Jari Aalto has proposed mksh in the past >(http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2007-09/msg00021.html), and that >it was subseque