I would appreciate further voting and/or reviewing to get this editor
which works fine under cygwin into the distribution.
OK this is a +1 vote and it does indeed work fine. However, there are
a couple of packaging issues.
So that's 3 now, thank you very much.
I will take care of the
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Thomas Wolff wrote:
I would appreciate further voting and/or reviewing to get this editor
which works fine under cygwin into the distribution.
OK this is a +1 vote and it does indeed work fine. However, there are
a couple of packaging issues.
So that's 3 now,
On Jun 10 19:35, Charles Wilson wrote:
Not that I'm complaining -- I'm just re-iterating cgf's point: not every
ITP'ed package makes it into the distro; even from long-time maintainers.
But you now have a chance ;-)
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding
I would appreciate further voting and/or reviewing to get this editor
which works fine under cygwin into the distribution.
As others have noted, unfortunately the best way is to bug the list.
I'm afraid that personally I am using Linux more and more and so doing
fewer reviews, but I have a few
I would appreciate further voting and/or reviewing to get this editor
which works fine under cygwin into the distribution.
OK this is a +1 vote and it does indeed work fine. However, there are
a couple of packaging issues.
*you have the files named mined-2000.9{,-src}.tar.bz2 while Cygwin
Hello,
I was wondering how this voting and package acceptance process would
be working. I had proposed my Unicode and CJK capable text editor
with message
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-03/msg00202.html
and there was 1 vote pro since then.
I would appreciate further voting and/or
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 02:26:05PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering how this voting and package acceptance process would be
working. I had proposed my Unicode and CJK capable text editor with
message http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-03/msg00202.html and
there was 1 vote pro
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 02:26:05PM +0200, Thomas.Wolff wrote:
I was wondering how this voting and package acceptance process would be
working. I had proposed my Unicode and CJK capable text editor with
message
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 02:26:05PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering how this voting and package acceptance process would be
working. I had proposed my Unicode and CJK capable text editor with
message http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2004-03/msg00202.html
