Hi. This is a sort-of HOWTO on building the winsup/docs from CVS.
After installing the test SGML/XML packages packages from
http://www.toomanysecrets.net/~foster/cygwin/
as detailed in
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-04/msg00072.html
and unpacking the stylesheets from
ftp://sourc
> From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Anyway, I vote to include this package!
> Would be nice if the Cygwin Doco Manager would write a short HOWTO about
> generating the Cygwin doco with this package.
I volunteered for that, didn't I?
Actually, I haven't downloaded their test-package
Hi Charles,
>> But when doing an install from local directory it wasn't offered
>> anymore in the chooser.
> Yes, but the problem here is that '-p4- is interpreted as "another part
> of the name" since it BEGINS with an alphabetic character. E.g. in
> "tetex-beta-", the 'beta' is part of the
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> It is still dubious for me.
> Setup was able to fetch it from the server during 'Download only' with
> version number '1'. But when doing an install from local directory it
> wasn't offered anymore in the chooser.
> IIRC Setup is able to install packages even if there
Hallo Christopher,
>>Could it be that setup cannot handle the version string "p4-1"? This
>>should be legal as far as I understand the Cygwin package
>>documentation, but then I might have misunderstood something. Should I
>>change the version string or should the setup maintainers look at
>>thei
Corinna Vinschen writes:
> "Package"? "Persion"? Ok, ok...
>
> In OpenSSH-3.2p1 it means "portable" to delimit from the plain
> OpenBSD version, perhaps here it's something similar...
The TEI homepage says about an older version of the DTD:
"The TEI's Guidelines for Electronic Text Encodi
Christopher Faylor writes:
> Can you point me to a place in the cygwin package documentation which
> indicates that p4-1 is a valid version number? It isn't as far as
> my understanding is concerned and I'd lke to rectify that. I don't
> see any way to unambiguously parse something like that
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 02:12:26PM +, Markus Hoenicka wrote:
>Gerrit P. Haase writes:
> > @ tei-xml
> > sdesc: "The Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) XML DTD"
> > ldesc: "The Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) XML DTD
> >
> > A large, modular, and flexible document type definition which is
> > widel
Gerrit P. Haase writes:
> I don't think that there is missing s.th, I can bunzip it without
> error and then untar it without error, just getting this error from
> tar when using tar xjf tei...tar.bz2
> I repackaged it and it is the same then... probably a bug in tar?
>
> It is only the one
--- Earnie Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
> >
> > Hi Markus,
> >
> > I am using these distributions in my propriatory software:
> >
>
> Your proprietary software will need to have a GPL license if it uses any
> library compiled with Cygwin1.dll dependencies. Your
Hallo Jon,
Am 2002-04-08 um 22:40 schriebst du:
> Hi,
> Is that only with the TEI ones, or with the Docbook ones too?
> I'll check the server...
I don't think that there is missing s.th, I can bunzip it without
error and then untar it without error, just getting this error from
tar when using
- Original Message -
From: "Markus Hoenicka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: SGML/XML packages available for testing
> Hi Jim,
>
> you mean a package dependency on Jade? This would be o
Hi Jim,
you mean a package dependency on Jade? This would be odd. If you just
need the Jade functionality, you can use the openjade package. It will
install a symlink called jade which should do the trick.
regards,
Markus
Jim writes:
> Ahh was just playing with postgresql and it wanted JADE -
> > finally Jon Foster and I got something that seems to work. The
> > following packages are available for testing:
>
> > docbook-dsssl
> > docbook-sgml
> > docbook-xml
> > docbook-xsl
> > openjade
Ahh was just playing with postgresql and it wanted JADE - suppose it'll be
weeks before this is a
Hallo Markus,
Am 2002-04-08 um 18:19 schriebst du:
> Hi,
> finally Jon Foster and I got something that seems to work. The
> following packages are available for testing:
> docbook-dsssl
> docbook-sgml
> docbook-xml
> docbook-xsl
> openjade
> sgml-base
> tei-xml
And I think the postinstallscri
Hallo Markus,
> finally Jon Foster and I got something that seems to work. The
> following packages are available for testing:
> docbook-dsssl
> docbook-sgml
> docbook-xml
> docbook-xsl
> openjade
> sgml-base
> tei-xml
> tei-xsl
I'm getting an error unpacking this, here:
$ tar xjvf tei-xsl-200
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
>
> Hi Markus,
>
> I am using these distributions in my propriatory software:
>
Your proprietary software will need to have a GPL license if it uses any
library compiled with Cygwin1.dll dependencies. Your proprietary
software will need to have a GPL license if it us
Hi,
Stanislav Sinyagin writes:
> Hi Markus,
>
> I am using these distributions in my propriatory software:
>
If you *really* mean proprietary, any interference of Cygwin packages
with your proprietary packages would be yours to solve, I reckon.
> Please let us know in which directories
Hi Markus,
I am using these distributions in my propriatory software:
> docbook-xml
> docbook-xsl
also I use Gnome.org's libxslt for processing the docbook files.
Please let us know in which directories you put these files.
There's no "standard" path for them, so let's define it clearly.
R
Christopher Faylor writes:
> Can you post the setup.hint files for the above, please?
>
Most if not all were posted a while ago (putting the packages together
took longer than expected), but here they are again. I'll be happy to
revise them if anything is wrong.
# setup.hint for the Cygwin do
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 04:19:52PM +, Markus Hoenicka wrote:
>finally Jon Foster and I got something that seems to work. The
>following packages are available for testing:
>
>docbook-dsssl
>docbook-sgml
>docbook-xml
>docbook-xsl
>openjade
>sgml-base
>tei-xml
>tei-xsl
>xml-base
>
>The easiest w
Hi,
finally Jon Foster and I got something that seems to work. The
following packages are available for testing:
docbook-dsssl
docbook-sgml
docbook-xml
docbook-xsl
openjade
sgml-base
tei-xml
tei-xsl
xml-base
The easiest way to test these packages is to enter:
http://www.toomanysecrets.net/~fos
22 matches
Mail list logo
