Re: Last pre-vacation patch (was Re: STC for libapr fcntl failure)

2013-05-27 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 26 11:51, David Rothenberger wrote: On 4/26/2013 11:33 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Apr 26 08:59, David Rothenberger wrote: The libapr1 tests are failing for Cygwin 64-bit when trying to use fcntl(3) for process mutexes. Calling fcntl() to acquire the lock currently fails with a

STC for libapr fcntl failure

2013-04-26 Thread David Rothenberger
The libapr1 tests are failing for Cygwin 64-bit when trying to use fcntl(3) for process mutexes. Calling fcntl() to acquire the lock currently fails with a lock: Bad address error. I've attached a simple test case that demonstrates the problem. Just run make to build and run it. -- David

Last pre-vacation patch (was Re: STC for libapr fcntl failure)

2013-04-26 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 26 08:59, David Rothenberger wrote: The libapr1 tests are failing for Cygwin 64-bit when trying to use fcntl(3) for process mutexes. Calling fcntl() to acquire the lock currently fails with a lock: Bad address error. I've attached a simple test case that demonstrates the problem. Just