On Fri, 2003-07-04 at 15:53, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> Finally got a chance to try this:
>
> > >>Does it interact (worsely) with large/small font settings. And so
> > >>on.
> > >
>
> Doesn't interact at all here from what I can tell, but I never had the problem
> before either.
Ditto.
> > > T
Finally got a chance to try this:
> >>Does it interact (worsely) with large/small font settings. And so
> >>on.
> >
Doesn't interact at all here from what I can tell, but I never had the problem
before either.
> >
> > The exact point of the patch is that it interacts *better* than the
> > curren
Hi Robert,
Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We have a user base of a few thousand, the error has been reported
> by, oh, 10 users, and it's been tested on even less machines
> (AFAIK).
10 bug reports (if it were that much) in a few thousand seems quite a
lot to me. I don't even wan
Benjamin Riefenstahl wrote:
Hi Robert,
Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'm still a little leery, as the already pointed out limitations -
are there machines with vector instead of bitmaps Dlg fonts.
As I already mentioned before, that is not the issue at all. It's
nice for debugging
Hi Robert,
Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm still a little leery, as the already pointed out limitations -
> are there machines with vector instead of bitmaps Dlg fonts.
As I already mentioned before, that is not the issue at all. It's
nice for debugging to wonder if the actual
Max Bowsher wrote:
Ping?
This is trivial in complexity, so shouldn't require a long review.
It is just:
-FONT 8, "MS Sans Serif"
+FONT 8, "MS Shell Dlg"
all through res.rc.
I've tested it, it works.
OK to apply?
I'm still a little leery, as the already pointed out limitations - are
there machi
Ping?
This is trivial in complexity, so shouldn't require a long review.
It is just:
-FONT 8, "MS Sans Serif"
+FONT 8, "MS Shell Dlg"
all through res.rc.
I've tested it, it works.
OK to apply?
Max.
Max Bowsher wrote:
> Reawakening discussion on this patch.
> Thread start:
> http://sources.
Ping?
It's a really simple patch - just
@@ -34 +34 @@
-FONT 8, "MS Sans Serif"
+FONT 8, "MS Shell Dlg"
all through res.rc.
Max Bowsher wrote:
> Reawakening discussion on this patch.
> Thread start:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-05/msg00177.html
>
> This appears to help the str
Reawakening discussion on this patch.
Thread start:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-05/msg00177.html
This appears to help the strange DPI issue.
Though Gary had some concerns that it wasn't the ultimate fix, it does seem
to fix the issue.
If we get this committed, I'll redo the sna
Hi Gary,
Sorry for this long reply. ;-)
"Gary R. Van Sickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm guessing that the "real" problem isn't the particular font used,
> but rather some code somewhere that isn't doing the ridiculously
> arcane "Dialog Units <-> Pixels <-> Font Size" conversions quite
> Benjamin Riefenstahl wrote:
> > Hi Gary,
> >
> > "Gary R. Van Sickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> A lot of people have been having this problem, it'd be great if we
> >> could fix this.
> >
> > So what's up? What more can I do to help?
>
> I've tested this now, it does fix the problem.
>
>
Benjamin Riefenstahl wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> "Gary R. Van Sickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> A lot of people have been having this problem, it'd be great if we
>> could fix this.
>
> So what's up? What more can I do to help?
I've tested this now, it does fix the problem.
I think this is read
Hi Gary,
"Gary R. Van Sickle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A lot of people have been having this problem, it'd be great if we
> could fix this.
So what's up? What more can I do to help?
so long, benny
13 matches
Mail list logo
