On 09/28/2017 06:39 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2017-07-13 13:49, Achim Gratz wrote:
>> Yaakov Selkowitz writes:
>>> It looks like GCC 6 would benefit from an update of isl to 0.16.1 (but
>>> NOT newer). This would be an ABI bump of libisl to 15, so existing GCC
>>> 5 builds would not be affe
Achim Gratz writes:
> Are you pinging me or JonY? If you meant me, just confirm the exact
> version and I'll see what there is to do. It would also be helpful to
> figure out which other versions we need to keep for the older gcc
> packages.
I've compiled 0.16.1 with no problems and all tests pa
Yaakov Selkowitz writes:
>>> If you've confirmed that this is the exact version gcc6 needs, then yes.
>>> Alternatively, Jon could take over the package to sync with any gcc
>>> updates, since I believe gcc is the only user anyway.
>
> Ping?
Are you pinging me or JonY? If you meant me, just confi
On 2017-07-13 13:49, Achim Gratz wrote:
>> Yaakov Selkowitz writes:
>>> It looks like GCC 6 would benefit from an update of isl to 0.16.1 (but
>>> NOT newer). This would be an ABI bump of libisl to 15, so existing GCC
>>> 5 builds would not be affected, as long as we aren't planning any more
>>> (
On 2017-07-13 13:49, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Yaakov Selkowitz writes:
>> It looks like GCC 6 would benefit from an update of isl to 0.16.1 (but
>> NOT newer). This would be an ABI bump of libisl to 15, so existing GCC
>> 5 builds would not be affected, as long as we aren't planning any more
>> (and I
Yaakov Selkowitz writes:
> It looks like GCC 6 would benefit from an update of isl to 0.16.1 (but
> NOT newer). This would be an ABI bump of libisl to 15, so existing GCC
> 5 builds would not be affected, as long as we aren't planning any more
> (and I sure hope we can move on at this point). Ach
It looks like GCC 6 would benefit from an update of isl to 0.16.1 (but
NOT newer). This would be an ABI bump of libisl to 15, so existing GCC
5 builds would not be affected, as long as we aren't planning any more
(and I sure hope we can move on at this point). Achim, if JonY agrees,
would you be