Re: Upload: pinfo-0.6.9-1 [Was: Package maintainer list]

2007-08-01 Thread Lapo Luchini
Lapo Luchini wrote: It does indeed need libiconv and libintl, but it currently links them statically. I'll investigate that a bit further and either convince it to use the shared ones or correct the setup.hint. OK, I failed to convince it so far. Given the fact that 5-25 August I will be

Re: Upload: pinfo-0.6.9-1 [Was: Package maintainer list]

2007-08-01 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:25:20PM +0200, Lapo Luchini wrote: Lapo Luchini wrote: It does indeed need libiconv and libintl, but it currently links them statically. I'll investigate that a bit further and either convince it to use the shared ones or correct the setup.hint. OK, I failed to

Re: Upload: pinfo-0.6.9-1 [Was: Package maintainer list]

2007-08-01 Thread Lapo Luchini
Christopher Faylor wrote: I'd say this is actually your call. If you are ok with linking them statically, I see no reason why you shouldn't do so. Then I'd say to upload it: the worst it can do is occupy slightly more space on disk. (and I'll have more time to try harder to have next

Re: Upload: pinfo-0.6.9-1 [Was: Package maintainer list]

2007-08-01 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Aug 1 20:56, Lapo Luchini wrote: http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/pinfo/pinfo-0.6.9-1-src.tar.bz2 http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/pinfo/pinfo-0.6.9-1.tar.bz2 http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/pinfo/setup.hint Uploaded. Thanks for taking over maintainership. Igor? It's that time of year again.

Re: Upload: pinfo-0.6.9-1 [Was: Package maintainer list]

2007-08-01 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 According to Lapo Luchini on 8/1/2007 11:25 AM: Lapo Luchini wrote: It does indeed need libiconv and libintl, but it currently links them statically. I'll investigate that a bit further and either convince it to use the shared ones or correct the

Re: Upload: pinfo-0.6.9-1 [Was: Package maintainer list]

2007-07-27 Thread Lapo Luchini
Lapo Luchini wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: Right, it requires libncurses8. It seems most requirements are unnecessary. pinfo.exe does neither link against libiconv, nor libintl. And, does it really require the man and texinfo packages? Does pinfo call the man and info binaries under

Re: Upload: pinfo-0.6.9-1 [Was: Package maintainer list]

2007-07-27 Thread Charles Wilson
Lapo Luchini wrote: OTOH, do all those other packages really need texinfo at *runtime*? autoconf2.5, automake1.10, automake1.4, automake1.5, automake1.6, automake1.7, automake1.8, automake1.9, cygwin-doc, gettext-devel, libtool1.5, octave, _update-info-dir The automakeVER packages generate

Re: Upload: pinfo-0.6.9-1 [Was: Package maintainer list]

2007-07-26 Thread Lapo Luchini
Corinna Vinschen wrote: Right, it requires libncurses8. It seems most requirements are unnecessary. pinfo.exe does neither link against libiconv, nor libintl. And, does it really require the man and texinfo packages? Does pinfo call the man and info binaries under the hood? I'll check it

Re: Upload: pinfo-0.6.9-1 [Was: Package maintainer list]

2007-07-26 Thread Lapo Luchini
Reini Urban wrote: Lapo Luchini schrieb: requires: cygwin libiconv2 libintl2 libncurses7 man texinfo Not libncurses8 ? Err.. yes, of course! I corrected the README and forgot to correct setup.hint. -- Lapo Luchini [EMAIL PROTECTED] (OpenPGP X.509) www.lapo.it (Jabber, ICQ, MSN)

Re: Upload: pinfo-0.6.9-1 [Was: Package maintainer list]

2007-07-26 Thread Reini Urban
Lapo Luchini schrieb: requires: cygwin libiconv2 libintl2 libncurses7 man texinfo Not libncurses8 ?

Upload: pinfo-0.6.9-1 [Was: Package maintainer list]

2007-07-25 Thread Lapo Luchini
Andrew Schulman wrote: I am actually in the process of packaging pinfo-0.6.9 (I was waiting till I had the real package ready)... it has some configure problem but I should have them solved shortly. OK, by all means take it. I did try to build it once before and failed, but would try again