On Jan 2 17:49, Yaakov S (Cygwin Ports) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I just figured that neither in the runtime, nor in the devel package of
GLIB and GLIB2 are any traces of static libraries.
Correct.
Is there any good reson for
Corinna schrieb:
Oh, yes, sorry about that. It's glib2 which would be helpful to
exist in a static version, too.
Gerrit?
Yes, Sir. Will change the buildscript and upload later today.
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
On Jan 3 13:55, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Corinna schrieb:
Oh, yes, sorry about that. It's glib2 which would be helpful to
exist in a static version, too.
Gerrit?
Yes, Sir. Will change the buildscript and upload later today.
Thanks, Ma'am ;-)
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Yes, Sir. Will change the buildscript and upload later today.
Thanks, Ma'am ;-)
I always supposed that Gerrit was a male name... but after all so does
Andrea, in Italy.
I guess I don't grok german quite enough 0:-)
Lapo
Lapo schrieb:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Yes, Sir. Will change the buildscript and upload later today.
Thanks, Ma'am ;-)
I always supposed that Gerrit was a male name... but after all so does
Andrea, in Italy.
I guess I don't grok german quite enough 0:-)
Actually Gerrit is a male and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I just figured that neither in the runtime, nor in the devel package of
GLIB and GLIB2 are any traces of static libraries.
Correct.
Is there any good reson for that?
We decided from the beginning to build GNOME
Yaakov,
I just figured that neither in the runtime, nor in the devel package of
GLIB and GLIB2 are any traces of static libraries.
Is there any good reson for that?
I'm asking since I'm going to prepare a package which would better be
linked statically to GLIB2. While I have no problems to
