Re: ask-2.5.0 - a new package for review

2003-06-30 Thread Jari Aalto+mail.linux
* Sun 2003-06-29 Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.cygwin-apps * Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robert Collins wrote: That said, I really don't think we want to formalise the package creation script. If we -really- are heading to compatibility with any existing format, surely our efforts

Re: ask-2.5.0 - a new package for review

2003-06-30 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Jari Aalto+mail.linux wrote: * Sun 2003-06-29 Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.cygwin-apps * Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robert Collins wrote: That said, I really don't think we want to formalise the package creation script. If we -really- are heading to

Re: ask-2.5.0 - a new package for review

2003-06-30 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 06:18:17PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: I was vetoing the package for inclusion in cygwin. I was actually nodding my head when I read your objection to packages being submitted which use cygbuild, but Chuck is right.

Re: ask-2.5.0 - a new package for review

2003-06-30 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 05:06:37PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 06:18:17PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: I was vetoing the package for inclusion in cygwin. I was actually nodding my head when I read your objection to

Re: ask-2.5.0 - a new package for review

2003-06-30 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 05:06:37PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 06:18:17PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: I was vetoing the package for inclusion in cygwin. I was

ask-2.5.0 - a new package for review

2003-06-29 Thread Jari Aalto+mail.linux
(a Debian) Python Project http://www.paganini.net/ask/ has bee ported. Please review. http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/ask/ask-2.5.0-1-src.tar.bz2 http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/ask/ask-2.5.0-1.tar.bz2 Jari @ ask sdesc: Active Spam Killer in python. Uses opt-in method. ldesc: Python

Re: ask-2.5.0 - a new package for review

2003-06-29 Thread Max Bowsher
Jari Aalto+mail.linux wrote: (a Debian) Python Project http://www.paganini.net/ask/ has bee ported. Please review. http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/ask/ask-2.5.0-1-src.tar.bz2 http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/ask/ask-2.5.0-1.tar.bz2 Before you ITP any more packages, you should address

Re: ask-2.5.0 - a new package for review

2003-06-29 Thread Max Bowsher
Charles Wilson wrote: Max Bowsher wrote: Jari Aalto+mail.linux wrote: (a Debian) Python Project http://www.paganini.net/ask/ has bee ported. Please review. http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/ask/ask-2.5.0-1-src.tar.bz2 http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/ask/ask-2.5.0-1.tar.bz2 Before you

Re: ask-2.5.0 - a new package for review

2003-06-29 Thread Robert Collins
On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 07:21, Max Bowsher wrote: I could have misinterpreted cgf's veto. I'm not entirely sure whether he was vetoing the package, or the use of yet another build system. The build system per se doesn't matter. We hashed this out waay back. What matters is: The binary layout.

Re: ask-2.5.0 - a new package for review

2003-06-29 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 10:21:18PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: Charles Wilson wrote: Max Bowsher wrote: Jari Aalto+mail.linux wrote: (a Debian) Python Project http://www.paganini.net/ask/ has bee ported. Please review. http://tierra.dyndns.org:81/cygwin/ask/ask-2.5.0-1-src.tar.bz2

Re: ask-2.5.0 - a new package for review

2003-06-29 Thread Charles Wilson
Robert Collins wrote: That said, I really don't think we want to formalise the package creation script. If we -really- are heading to compatibility with any existing format, surely our efforts are bested directed to achieving that, not to (relatively minor) fiddling within our adhoc format.

Re: ask-2.5.0 - a new package for review

2003-06-29 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 06:18:17PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: I was vetoing the package for inclusion in cygwin. I was actually nodding my head when I read your objection to packages being submitted which use cygbuild, but Chuck is right. Since there is no official package in the