On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 06:55:59AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> >Add a section to setup.ini that doesn't conflict with the parser logic
> >for:
> >RPM database files (future planning)
> >apt Releases
> >apt Sources
> >apt Packages
> >
> >that prov
On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 06:55:59AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>Add a section to setup.ini that doesn't conflict with the parser logic
>for:
>RPM database files (future planning)
>apt Releases
>apt Sources
>apt Packages
>
>that provides the metadata on categories.
>
>i.e.
>section-details: Net
>Vi
Add a section to setup.ini that doesn't conflict with the parser logic
for:
RPM database files (future planning)
apt Releases
apt Sources
apt Packages
that provides the metadata on categories.
i.e.
section-details: Net
Visible-Name: Net
Aliases: Networking
Description: "Packages in this section a
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Lapo Luchini wrote:
> [snip]
>
> This leads me to think that maybe also categories could use a
> "Description", and not only single packages. This could clarify each
> category meaning.
> e.g. if math is "things that can be used to easily do math" then clisp
> is in (as it is
Sam Steingold wrote:
But isn't that true for any scripting language?
do all scripting languages come with arbitrary length integers _and_ floats?
please compute 1000! in perl.
I guess then that the following code admits python in the Math category
too ^_^
>>> l = 1
>>> for i in range(2,1
> * Dean Scarff [2003-09-20 16:12:14 +0800]:
>
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 17:04:01 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> >> shells: can be your login shell (http://clisp.cons.org/clash.html)
>
> would mean that all interpreters with a system interface (perl,
> python, cint, et al) would fall into the sh
On Fri, 19 Sep 2003 17:04:01 +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
shells: can be your login shell (http://clisp.cons.org/clash.html)
Done.
Sorry, but as much as I love and respect *lisp (as any emacs user must),
that doesn't mean it should go into the shells category. It would mean
that all interpret
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 11:15:36AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 10:48:36AM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
> >> * Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-19 14:12:32 +0200]:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 08:42:32PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote:
> >> > I don't think
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 10:48:36AM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
>> * Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-19 14:12:32 +0200]:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 08:42:32PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote:
>> > I don't think everyone wants to install it.
>>
>> Thanks for the heads up. I moved it int
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 10:48:36AM -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
> > * Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-19 14:12:32 +0200]:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 08:42:32PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote:
> > > I don't think everyone wants to install it.
> >
> > Thanks for the heads up. I moved
> * Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-19 14:12:32 +0200]:
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 08:42:32PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote:
> > I don't think everyone wants to install it.
>
> Thanks for the heads up. I moved it into categories Interpreters and
> Devel.
actually, may I suggest
cate
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 08:42:32PM +1000, Gareth Pearce wrote:
> I don't think everyone wants to install it.
Thanks for the heads up. I moved it into categories Interpreters and
Devel.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer
I don't think everyone wants to install it.
Regards,
Gareth
13 matches
Mail list logo
