> On 2014-08-11 17:03, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> > attached 2 files.
> > The first is basically what should be the new cygwin-pkg-maint
> > that cover all the active package in both 32bit and 64 bit.
>
> This was great, thank you. After rearranging the release areas, I was
> able to get a more relia
On 2014-08-13 04:23, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 12/08/2014 13:34, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 12/08/2014 07:22, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
Could you check the latest cygwin-pkg-maint and see if I missed
anything?
I will re-run possible today.
No missing Maintainers for active packages (Category != _obs
On 12/08/2014 13:34, Marco Atzeri wrote:
n 12/08/2014 07:22, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2014-08-11 17:03, Marco Atzeri wrote:
That always annoyed be about this list, so I did change the list to use
proper case.
I will reinstate proper case on next check.
Could you check the latest cygwin-p
n 12/08/2014 07:22, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2014-08-11 17:03, Marco Atzeri wrote:
That always annoyed be about this list, so I did change the list to use
proper case.
I will reinstate proper case on next check.
Could you check the latest cygwin-pkg-maint and see if I missed anything?
I
On 2014-08-11 17:03, Marco Atzeri wrote:
attached 2 files.
The first is basically what should be the new cygwin-pkg-maint
that cover all the active package in both 32bit and 64 bit.
This was great, thank you. After rearranging the release areas, I was
able to get a more reliable list of what