Re: genini: comments

2010-06-22 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 09:51:55AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 11:59:46PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 00:38 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: That's not right. The intent is to provide comments like: foo: bar #comment Ah, well according

Re: genini: comments

2010-06-09 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 11:59:46PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 00:38 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: That's not right. The intent is to provide comments like: foo: bar #comment Ah, well according to the website, mid-line comments are not allowed. But if the website

genini: comments

2010-06-08 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
setup.html says (emphasis mine): Lines that *begin* with '#' are considered to be comments and are ignored by the setup.ini generator. Some of my sdesc/ldesc include a '#' not in the context of a comment (e.g. C#), and this was causing the rest of the field to be chomp()ed, mangling the

Re: genini: comments

2010-06-08 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 11:32:39PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: setup.html says (emphasis mine): Lines that *begin* with '#' are considered to be comments and are ignored by the setup.ini generator. Some of my sdesc/ldesc include a '#' not in the context of a comment (e.g. C#), and this

Re: genini: comments

2010-06-08 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 00:38 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: That's not right. The intent is to provide comments like: foo: bar #comment Ah, well according to the website, mid-line comments are not allowed. But if the website is wrong and they are supposed to be allowed, then those within