On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 09:51:55AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 11:59:46PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 00:38 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
That's not right. The intent is to provide comments like:
foo: bar #comment
Ah, well according
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 11:59:46PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 00:38 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
That's not right. The intent is to provide comments like:
foo: bar #comment
Ah, well according to the website, mid-line comments are not allowed.
But if the website
setup.html says (emphasis mine):
Lines that *begin* with '#' are considered to be comments and are
ignored by the setup.ini generator.
Some of my sdesc/ldesc include a '#' not in the context of a comment
(e.g. C#), and this was causing the rest of the field to be chomp()ed,
mangling the
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 11:32:39PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
setup.html says (emphasis mine):
Lines that *begin* with '#' are considered to be comments and are
ignored by the setup.ini generator.
Some of my sdesc/ldesc include a '#' not in the context of a comment
(e.g. C#), and this
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 00:38 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
That's not right. The intent is to provide comments like:
foo: bar #comment
Ah, well according to the website, mid-line comments are not allowed.
But if the website is wrong and they are supposed to be allowed, then
those within