Hello Robert,
Wednesday, May 01, 2002, 10:58:32 AM, you wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Pavel Tsekov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 6:53 PM
>> Zero terminated strings (C style strings) has nothing to do with the
>> basic_string template class. basic_
> -Original Message-
> From: Pavel Tsekov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 6:53 PM
> Zero terminated strings (C style strings) has nothing to do with the
> basic_string template class. basic_string can contain any character
> including \0. Its much the same as
Hello Robert,
Wednesday, May 01, 2002, 10:22:03 AM, you wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Gary R. Van Sickle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 5:39 AM
>> > Except that widechar != unicode. WCHAR is still an 0 terminated
>> > string, but Unicode strings are
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary R. Van Sickle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 5:39 AM
> > Except that widechar != unicode. WCHAR is still an 0 terminated
> > string, but Unicode strings are not 0 terminated.
>
> Sure they are. A Unicode '\0' == 0x (re
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 4:39 AM
> It is more usual for projects to store the configure scripts,
> however. It is also more usual not to change the convention
> once it has been set.
And I have _not_ ch
> Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>
> > (thank the three men I admire most,
> > the Father, Son, and the Holy Ghost!).
>
>
> Hah! An American Pie reference! "Bye, bye Miss American Pie, Drove my
> chevy to the levy but the levy was dry..."
>
> --Chuck
Heehehee ;-)
"And the three men I admire
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> (thank the three men I admire most,
> the Father, Son, and the Holy Ghost!).
Hah! An American Pie reference! "Bye, bye Miss American Pie, Drove my
chevy to the levy but the levy was dry..."
--Chuck
> > There's a cute 'trick' here that gives you the best of both worlds:
> >
> > typedef basic_string< TCHAR > StringAW;
> >
> > Now the "StringAW" type is either wide or narrow depending on
> > build-time defines.
>
> Except that widechar != unicode. WCHAR is still an 0 terminated string,
> but Un
On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 06:09:22PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>>On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 04:38:48AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>>
>>>As usual, nothing is fixed in stone, and if this is a significant issue,
>>>it can be revisited.
>>
>>I have to agree with Earnie her
> -Original Message-
> From: Gary R. Van Sickle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 12:43 PM
> To: Cygwin-Apps
> Subject: RE: libgetopt++ and setup and libstdc++
>
>
> > Ok,
> > we're finally there. Setup now can use li
> Ok,
> we're finally there. Setup now can use libstdc++ routines,
> allowing the full range of C++ programming constructs. Probably even
> exceptions, but I have not tested that yet.
>
As the late Kool-Aid man once said, "OH YEAH!"!
[snip]
> We can also use the C++ string class. However,
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 8:09 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: libgetopt++ and setup and libstdc++
>
>
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 7:08 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: libgetopt++ and setup and libstdc++
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 04:38:48AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 04:38:48AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>
>>As usual, nothing is fixed in stone, and if this is a significant issue,
>>it can be revisited.
>>
>
> I have to agree with Earnie here. AFAIK, every other toolchain on
> sources.redhat.com stores t
On Sun, Apr 28, 2002 at 04:38:48AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>As usual, nothing is fixed in stone, and if this is a significant issue,
>it can be revisited.
I have to agree with Earnie here. AFAIK, every other toolchain on
sources.redhat.com stores the autogenerated files in CVS.
cgf
> -Original Message-
> From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 4:23 AM
> > However, CVS is _not_ a distribution, and anyone developing
> from CVS
> > will require the autotool suite if they make any
> non-trivial changes.
> >
>
> A source distri
Robert Collins wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> > > *** IMPORTANT ***
> > > libgetopt++ does not store the autotool created files in CVS. You'll
> > > need to run ./bootstrap.sh in it's source dir to create them.
> > > *
> -Original Message-
> From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > *** IMPORTANT ***
> > libgetopt++ does not store the autotool created files in CVS. You'll
> > need to run ./bootstrap.sh in it's source dir to create them.
> > *
> >
>
> That's goes against the F
Robert Collins wrote:
>
> Ok,
> we're finally there. Setup now can use libstdc++ routines,
> allowing the full range of C++ programming constructs. Probably even
> exceptions, but I have not tested that yet.
>
> I've removed the half-done GetOption.cc and GetOption.h from setup, they
> a
Ok,
we're finally there. Setup now can use libstdc++ routines,
allowing the full range of C++ programming constructs. Probably even
exceptions, but I have not tested that yet.
I've removed the half-done GetOption.cc and GetOption.h from setup, they
are part of libgetopt++, which is a much
20 matches
Mail list logo
