Re: lost announcements

2011-10-26 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 09:24:22AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >I'm wondering if the raw mail address filter isn't a bit overagressive. >Am I mistaken or has the traffic on the cygwin ML gone down a lot >lately? I thought it was obvious that I spend some time every day dealing with spam, bounce

Re: lost announcements

2011-10-26 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 26 02:27, Andrew Schulman wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 09:17:40AM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: > > >> >Hm, you're right. But the odd thing is that they weren't posted to the > > >> >cygwin > > >> >list, which is where I read them: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-10/. > > >> > > >

Re: lost announcements

2011-10-25 Thread Andrew Schulman
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 09:17:40AM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: > >> >Hm, you're right. But the odd thing is that they weren't posted to the > >> >cygwin > >> >list, which is where I read them: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-10/. > >> > > >> >Any idea why? > >> > >> Embedded email address.

Re: lost announcements

2011-10-25 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 09:17:40AM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: >> >Hm, you're right. But the odd thing is that they weren't posted to the >> >cygwin >> >list, which is where I read them: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-10/. >> > >> >Any idea why? >> >> Embedded email address. > >Could you pl

Re: lost announcements

2011-10-25 Thread Andrew Schulman
> >Hm, you're right. But the odd thing is that they weren't posted to the > >cygwin > >list, which is where I read them: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2011-10/. > > > >Any idea why? > > Embedded email address. Could you please be more specific? I've compared the 4 announcements, and I can't see

Re: lost announcements

2011-10-24 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 05:20:52PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:16:18PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: >> > This morning I sent 4 package update announcements to cygwin-announce. >> > Two of >> > them (socat, lftp) were posted, but the other two (stunnel, sng) haven'

Re: lost announcements

2011-10-24 Thread David Sastre
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 05:20:52PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:16:18PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: > > > This morning I sent 4 package update announcements to cygwin-announce. > > > Two of > > > them (socat, lftp) were posted, but the other two (stunnel, sng) ha

Re: lost announcements

2011-10-24 Thread Andrew Schulman
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:16:18PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: > > This morning I sent 4 package update announcements to cygwin-announce. Two > > of > > them (socat, lftp) were posted, but the other two (stunnel, sng) haven't > > shown > > up yet. Meanwhile, other later announcements have b

Re: lost announcements

2011-10-24 Thread David Sastre
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:16:18PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote: > This morning I sent 4 package update announcements to cygwin-announce. Two of > them (socat, lftp) were posted, but the other two (stunnel, sng) haven't shown > up yet. Meanwhile, other later announcements have been posted. > > A

lost announcements

2011-10-24 Thread Andrew Schulman
This morning I sent 4 package update announcements to cygwin-announce. Two of them (socat, lftp) were posted, but the other two (stunnel, sng) haven't shown up yet. Meanwhile, other later announcements have been posted. Are the missing messages held up in the queue? Anything I need to do about