On Jan 30 12:38, Lapo Luchini wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jan 29 20:21, Lapo Luchini wrote:
> >
> >> Please upload as TEST version, keeping 0.25 as default.
> >>
> >> http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/monotone/monotone-0.26pre1-1-src.tar.bz2
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 29 20:21, Lapo Luchini wrote:
>
>> Please upload as TEST version, keeping 0.25 as default.
>>
>> http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/monotone/monotone-0.26pre1-1-src.tar.bz2
>> http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/monotone/monotone-0.26pre1-1.tar.
On Jan 29 20:21, Lapo Luchini wrote:
> Please upload as TEST version, keeping 0.25 as default.
>
> http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/monotone/monotone-0.26pre1-1-src.tar.bz2
> http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/monotone/monotone-0.26pre1-1.tar.bz2
Since that's a test version, it re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please upload as TEST version, keeping 0.25 as default.
Files:
http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/monotone/monotone-0.26pre1-1-src.tar.bz2
http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/monotone/monotone-0.26pre1-1.tar.bz2
Signatures:
http://cyberx.lapo.it/cygwin/monotone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Lapo Luchini on 1/26/2006 3:35 PM:
>
> I prepared 0.26pre1 version for my own experimenting.
>
> I'm asking for advice here: should we release them as a "test" version
> and let people experiment a bit, or we better wait for 0.26 "final"
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.monotone.devel/5647
Monotone 0.26 will use "rosters". I'm not quite sure what they are but
the essentials are:
a. they are smaller than the old revision-metadata format
b. they are more flexible and will permit new features
c. they are totally in
