Re: ocaml packaging issue

2009-10-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 19 10:06, Andy Koppe wrote: > 2009/10/19 Corinna Vinschen: > >> The executables in the ocaml package have access rights rwx--x--x, > >> which means non-admins can't run them: > >> > >> bash: /usr/bin/ocaml: Permission denied > > > > Execute permissions alone should be sufficient to start an

Re: ocaml packaging issue

2009-10-19 Thread Andy Koppe
2009/10/19 Corinna Vinschen: >> The executables in the ocaml package have access rights rwx--x--x, >> which means non-admins can't run them: >> >> bash: /usr/bin/ocaml: Permission denied > > Execute permissions alone should be sufficient to start an executable, > usually. You're right. I had wonde

Re: ocaml packaging issue

2009-10-19 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 19 05:53, Andy Koppe wrote: > The executables in the ocaml package have access rights rwx--x--x, > which means non-admins can't run them: > > bash: /usr/bin/ocaml: Permission denied Execute permissions alone should be sufficient to start an executable, usually. That's a bug in Cygwin. Th

Re: ocaml packaging issue

2009-10-19 Thread Andrew Schulman
> The executables in the ocaml package have access rights rwx--x--x, > which means non-admins can't run them: > > bash: /usr/bin/ocaml: Permission denied I believe that ocaml is without a maintainer ATM. I've looked into packaging ocaml myself, and it's a tremendous PITA. The Makefile doesn't s

ocaml packaging issue

2009-10-18 Thread Andy Koppe
The executables in the ocaml package have access rights rwx--x--x, which means non-admins can't run them: bash: /usr/bin/ocaml: Permission denied Andy