Re: please upload: singular 3.1.6-2 packages

2013-02-23 Thread marco atzeri
On 2/23/2013 4:35 PM, Yue Ren wrote: I don't know whether Cygwin has a policy of keeping all packages, but if not and as 3.1.6-1 is broken, I suggest to remove it. Thanks. :-) broken one should be always removed. Usually we maintain only two versions: current and previous Which ones is always

Re: please upload: singular 3.1.6-2 packages

2013-02-23 Thread marco atzeri
On 2/4/2013 10:59 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Feb 1 15:23, Yue Ren wrote: On behalf of the SINGULAR developer team, please upload the following package updates for SINGULAR: (In the 3.1.6-1 packages, some features were broken because apparently some files do not liked to be compiled with gcc

Re: please upload: singular 3.1.6-2 packages

2013-02-04 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 1 15:23, Yue Ren wrote: > On behalf of the SINGULAR developer team, please upload the following > package updates for SINGULAR: > (In the 3.1.6-1 packages, some features were broken because apparently > some files do not liked to be compiled with gcc 3.4.4. Switching to a > newer version fi

please upload: singular 3.1.6-2 packages

2013-02-01 Thread Yue Ren
On behalf of the SINGULAR developer team, please upload the following package updates for SINGULAR: (In the 3.1.6-1 packages, some features were broken because apparently some files do not liked to be compiled with gcc 3.4.4. Switching to a newer version fixed the errors) -