On 25/01/2017 21:58, Andrew Schulman wrote:
On 25/01/2017 13:21, Andrew Schulman wrote:
Can someone please remove screen 4.5.0-1 from the archive?
For future reference, you can do this yourself, see [1]
[1] https://cygwin.com/package-upload.html#deleting
If I do that, will the previous
> On 25/01/2017 13:21, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > Can someone please remove screen 4.5.0-1 from the archive?
>
> For future reference, you can do this yourself, see [1]
>
> [1] https://cygwin.com/package-upload.html#deleting
If I do that, will the previous release automati
> On 25/01/2017 13:21, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > Can someone please remove screen 4.5.0-1 from the archive?
>
> For future reference, you can do this yourself, see [1]
>
> [1] https://cygwin.com/package-upload.html#deleting
Cool, thanks. I hadn't seen that.
On 25/01/2017 13:21, Andrew Schulman wrote:
Can someone please remove screen 4.5.0-1 from the archive?
screen 4.5.0 has at least one serious security problem [1], and maybe some other
bugs too. I doubt Cygwin is affected, since screen doesn't rely on root
privileges there. But 4.5.0 is o
On Jan 25 08:21, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> Can someone please remove screen 4.5.0-1 from the archive?
>
> screen 4.5.0 has at least one serious security problem [1], and maybe some
> other
> bugs too. I doubt Cygwin is affected, since screen doesn't rely on root
> privile
Can someone please remove screen 4.5.0-1 from the archive?
screen 4.5.0 has at least one serious security problem [1], and maybe some other
bugs too. I doubt Cygwin is affected, since screen doesn't rely on root
privileges there. But 4.5.0 is only a minor update and a fix isn't g
Il 7/4/2013 6:09 AM, Andrew Schulman ha scritto:
what about 4.0.3-5 ?
Please remove that version. Thanks, Andrew.
done
> what about 4.0.3-5 ?
Please remove that version. Thanks, Andrew.
Il 7/4/2013 3:17 AM, Andrew Schulman ha scritto:
Please upload, for 32 and 64 bits. Please remove 4.1.0-20130513-1, leaving
4.0.3-7 as previous. Thanks, Andrew.
done.
what about 4.0.3-5 ?
# 32 bits
# 64 bits
done
Please upload, for 32 and 64 bits. Please remove 4.1.0-20130513-1, leaving
4.0.3-7 as previous. Thanks, Andrew.
# 32 bits
B=http://home.comcast.net/~andrex2/cygwin32
wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=2 \
$B/screen/screen-4.1.0-20130513-2-src.tar.bz2 \
$B/screen/screen-4.1.0-20130513-2.tar.bz2 \
$B
Il 6/28/2013 8:15 PM, Andrew Schulman ha scritto:
Please upload just this setup.hint, which has changed to make the new
release of screen current instead of test. Thanks, Andrew.
# 32 bits
wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=2 \
http://home.comcast.net/~andrex2/cygwin32/screen/setup.hint
uploaded
Please upload just this setup.hint, which has changed to make the new
release of screen current instead of test. Thanks, Andrew.
# 32 bits
wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=2 \
http://home.comcast.net/~andrex2/cygwin32/screen/setup.hint
.
>
> # 32-bit
> wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=4 \
> http://home.comcast.net/~andrex2/cygwin/screen/32bit/setup.hint \
>
> http://home.comcast.net/~andrex2/cygwin/screen/32bit/screen-4.1.0-20130513-1.tar.bz2
> \
>
> http://home.comcast.net/~andrex2/cygwin/screen/3
Please upload. This is a test release, so please leave all previous versions
in place for now.
This is also my first 64-bit package, so I'd appreciate a look that everything
is as it should be.
Thanks,
Andrew.
# 32-bit
wget -x -nH --cut-dirs=4 \
http://home.comcast.net/~andrex2/cygwin/s
> On May 19 12:09, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > > New Cygwin release, with a new explanation in README.Cygwin that users
> > > won't be able to reattach their sessions if /tmp is on a FAT file system.
> >
> > Sorry, please cancel the upload request. I'll send a new request shortly.
> > Thanks, Andr
On May 19 12:09, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> > New Cygwin release, with a new explanation in README.Cygwin that users
> > won't be able to reattach their sessions if /tmp is on a FAT file system.
>
> Sorry, please cancel the upload request. I'll send a new request shortly.
> Thanks, Andrew.
Oops, t
On May 19 12:06, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> New Cygwin release, with a new explanation in README.Cygwin that users
> won't be able to reattach their sessions if /tmp is on a FAT file system.
> Please:
>
> * Upload version 4.0.3-7, including setup.hint, which has changed since I'm
> taking a previous
> New Cygwin release, with a new explanation in README.Cygwin that users
> won't be able to reattach their sessions if /tmp is on a FAT file system.
Sorry, please cancel the upload request. I'll send a new request shortly.
Thanks, Andrew.
ns 4.0.3-1, -4, and -6, leaving -5 as previous.
Thanks, Andrew.
wget \
http://home.comcast.net/~andrex2/cygwin/screen/setup.hint \
http://home.comcast.net/~andrex2/cygwin/screen/screen-4.0.3-7.tar.bz2 \
http://home.comcast.net/~andrex2/cygwin/screen/screen-4.0.3-7-src.tar.bz2
On Nov 18 12:32, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> This is a test release of screen, that includes the vertical split patch.
> Please upload, including setup.hint which has changed to include test,
> curr, and prev tags.
>
> Please remove version 4.0.3-1 from the archive, leaving version
This is a test release of screen, that includes the vertical split patch.
Please upload, including setup.hint which has changed to include test,
curr, and prev tags.
Please remove version 4.0.3-1 from the archive, leaving versions 4.0.3-4,
-5, and -6.
Thanks,
Andrew.
wget \
http
On Aug 7 12:21, Andy Koppe wrote:
> On 7 August 2010 10:20, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Maybe it's better to provide
> > as much information as possible. What about this:
> >
> >
> > libao (1.0.0-1)
> > Cross-Platform Audio Output Library (Transition)
> > Re
On 7 August 2010 18:14, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 10:56:48AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> Please go ahead and check it in, after testing.
>
> What's this "after testing" thing?
>
> Oh. Wait. Nevermind. Good idea.
I've tortured it a fair bit, including trying to de
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 10:56:48AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Aug 7 06:39, Andy Koppe wrote:
>> On 7 August 2010 05:29, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> > On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 10:29:43PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
>> >>FWIW, attached is my take on a fix for this. ??Getting the same
>> >>depen
On 7 August 2010 09:56, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 7 06:39, Andy Koppe wrote:
>> On 7 August 2010 05:29, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> > On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 10:29:43PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
>> >>FWIW, attached is my take on a fix for this. Getting the same
>> >>dependencies, but addit
On 7 August 2010 10:20, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Maybe it's better to provide
> as much information as possible. What about this:
>
>
> libao (1.0.0-1)
> Cross-Platform Audio Output Library (Transition)
> Required by: libao4, libao-devel
>
> libao-dev
On Aug 6 17:34, Charles Wilson wrote:
> On 8/6/2010 5:18 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Aug 6 17:09, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>Why not present as much info as possible? I don't know what "libkate"
> >>is but it would be nice to be able to satisfy my curiousity on that page
> >>rather than
On Aug 7 06:39, Andy Koppe wrote:
> On 7 August 2010 05:29, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 10:29:43PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
> >>FWIW, attached is my take on a fix for this. Getting the same
> >>dependencies, but additional "Required bys". (Actually libcurl4 and
> >>libs
On 7 August 2010 05:29, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 10:29:43PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
>>FWIW, attached is my take on a fix for this. Getting the same
>>dependencies, but additional "Required bys". (Actually libcurl4 and
>>libssh2_1 are extra dependencies, but I assume yo
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 10:29:43PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
>FWIW, attached is my take on a fix for this. Getting the same
>dependencies, but additional "Required bys". (Actually libcurl4 and
>libssh2_1 are extra dependencies, but I assume you already have them
>installed.
This seems to do the s
On 6 August 2010 22:43, Andy Koppe wrote:
> On 6 August 2010 21:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> + for (n = unmet.begin (); n != unmet.end (); ++n)
>> + {
>> + if (!(*n).first->prereq_checked ())
>> + {
>> + (*n).first->prereq_checked (true);
>> +
On 6 August 2010 21:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> + for (n = unmet.begin (); n != unmet.end (); ++n)
> + {
> + if (!(*n).first->prereq_checked ())
> + {
> + (*n).first->prereq_checked (true);
> + for (vector *>::iterator i =
> +
On 8/6/2010 5:18 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Aug 6 17:09, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Why not present as much info as possible? I don't know what "libkate"
is but it would be nice to be able to satisfy my curiousity on that page
rather than jumping to a web page and googling.
Well, that's o
On 6 August 2010 21:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> I had a go at it, see below. Does it make sense? I tested this by
>> selecting *only* the flac-devel package, which resulted in the following
>> "Resolve Dependecies" dialog:
>>
>> Package: libFLAC++6
>> Required by: flac-devel
>>
>>
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 11:18:58PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>Well, that's ok. But I don't think it's important to learn where the
>dependency comes from. If you want to know what the missing package
>provides, the sdesc might be more informative, like this:
>
> libao versi
On Aug 6 23:18, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 6 17:09, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > Why not present as much info as possible? I don't know what "libkate"
> > is but it would be nice to be able to satisfy my curiousity on that page
> > rather than jumping to a web page and googling.
>
> Well
On Aug 6 17:09, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 11:06:38PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Aug 6 22:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> On Aug 6 22:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> > I had a go at it [...]
> >> Here's another test with only selecting the vorbis-tools packag
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 11:06:38PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Aug 6 22:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Aug 6 22:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> > I had a go at it [...]
>> Here's another test with only selecting the vorbis-tools package.
>> [...]
>
>And, while we're at it, do we *really*
On Aug 6 22:26, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 6 22:08, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > I had a go at it [...]
> Here's another test with only selecting the vorbis-tools package.
> [...]
And, while we're at it, do we *really* have to create such a detailed
dependency view? Wouldn't it be much les
On Aug 6 21:52, Andy Koppe wrote:
> On 6 August 2010 21:36, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 10:26:02PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>Looks still good, doesn't it?
> >
> > Yep. Andy do you agree?
>
> I'm still working on a patch that tries to address this without a
> s
On 6 August 2010 21:36, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 10:26:02PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>Here's another test with only selecting the vorbis-tools package.
>>With the current setup from CVS:
>>
>> Package: libao4
>> Required by: vorbis-tools
>>
>> Package: l
gt;> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:25:54PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
>> > >>> >The dependency resolver page only adds direct
>> > >>> >dependencies of packages that have been selected, not indirect ones,
>> > >>> >so you end up
>> >The dependency resolver page only adds direct
> > >>> >dependencies of packages that have been selected, not indirect ones,
> > >>> >so you end up with missing DLLs. (They do get added before the package
> > >>> >selection screen if you
gt;> >dependencies of packages that have been selected, not indirect ones,
> >>> >so you end up with missing DLLs. (They do get added before the package
> >>> >selection screen if you run setup.exe again.)
> >>
> >> I'm looking into it, but i
> Except for people who volunteer to support a package and then disappear,
> I don't think we should be eliminating gold stars. If we removed stars
> because of bugs we'd set very unrealistic expectations.
Works for me.
, not indirect ones,
>>> >so you end up with missing DLLs. (They do get added before the package
>>> >selection screen if you run setup.exe again.)
>>
>> I'm looking into it, but it's tricky for people not quite up to speed
>> with STL. Basically th
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:25:13PM -0400, Andrew Schulman wrote:
>> I obviously didn't test this properly. Andrew, please remove the gold
>> star I got for this.
>
>Doh! I don't think this has ever happened before!
>
>I'll have to think about it. Maybe half a star... or a pewter star :)
Except f
> I obviously didn't test this properly. Andrew, please remove the gold
> star I got for this.
Doh! I don't think this has ever happened before!
I'll have to think about it. Maybe half a star... or a pewter star :)
have been selected, not indirect ones,
>> >so you end up with missing DLLs. (They do get added before the package
>> >selection screen if you run setup.exe again.)
>> >
>> >I obviously didn't test this properly. Andrew, please remove the gold
>> >s
gt;>
> >> Now we get to find the bug reports hiding behind this bug.
> >
> >Found one, and it's big. The dependency resolver page only adds direct
> >dependencies of packages that have been selected, not indirect ones,
> >so you end up with missing DLLs. (They d
ug.
>
>Found one, and it's big. The dependency resolver page only adds direct
>dependencies of packages that have been selected, not indirect ones,
>so you end up with missing DLLs. (They do get added before the package
>selection screen if you run setup.exe again.)
>
>I ob
rect
dependencies of packages that have been selected, not indirect ones,
so you end up with missing DLLs. (They do get added before the package
selection screen if you run setup.exe again.)
I obviously didn't test this properly. Andrew, please remove the gold
star I got for this.
I won't
On 5 August 2010 16:42, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> How about this?
>>>
>>> ==
>>> Unmet Dependencies Found [in bold]
>>> The following packages are required to meet dependencies.
>>
>>I would prefer "satisfy" instead of "meet". But it doesn't matter.
>>Just go ahead.
>
> I also find "meet"
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 10:18:05AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Jul 31 21:44, Andy Koppe wrote:
>> On 26 July 2010 09:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> > Is the above "The following packages are required to
>> > satisfy dependencies of your selection." ok? ??I'm wondering if it's
>> > a bit too
On Jul 31 21:44, Andy Koppe wrote:
> On 26 July 2010 09:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Is the above "The following packages are required to
> > satisfy dependencies of your selection." ok? I'm wondering if it's
> > a bit too wordy, but I admit I have no better way to say this.
>
> How about this
On 26 July 2010 09:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Is the above "The following packages are required to
> satisfy dependencies of your selection." ok? I'm wondering if it's
> a bit too wordy, but I admit I have no better way to say this.
How about this?
==
Unmet Dependencies Found [in bold]
Th
On Jul 24 10:58, Andy Koppe wrote:
> On 23 July 2010 11:22, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jul 23 09:15, Andy Koppe wrote:
> >> On 23 July 2010 05:59, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 05:38:24AM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
> >> >>Unmet Dependencies Found [in bold]
> >> >>The fo
On 23 July 2010 11:22, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 23 09:15, Andy Koppe wrote:
>> On 23 July 2010 05:59, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 05:38:24AM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
>> >>Unmet Dependencies Found [in bold]
>> >>The following packages are required but have not been
On Jul 23 09:15, Andy Koppe wrote:
> On 23 July 2010 05:59, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 05:38:24AM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
> >>Unmet Dependencies Found [in bold]
> >>The following packages are required but have not been selected.
> >>
> >>Package: binutils
> >> Requ
On 23 July 2010 05:59, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 05:38:24AM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
>>Unmet Dependencies Found [in bold]
>>The following packages are required but have not been selected.
>>
>>Package: binutils
>> Required by: gcc4-g++
>>
>>Package: gcc4-core
>>
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 05:38:24AM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote:
>Unmet Dependencies Found [in bold]
>The following packages are required but have not been selected.
>
>Package: binutils
> Required by: gcc4-g++
>
>Package: gcc4-core
> Required by: gcc4-g++
>
>[tickbox] Install these packages
dependency updates work properly both for adding and
>>removing packages would be a major undertaking, and I think in their
>>current state they cause more problems than they're worth. Therefore,
>>this patch simply disables dependency updates during package
>>select
d I think in their
>current state they cause more problems than they're worth. Therefore,
>this patch simply disables dependency updates during package
>selection.
>
>Instead, the 'Resolve Dependencies' screen which would usually have
>been skipped will get more use. This h
dency updates during package
selection.
Instead, the 'Resolve Dependencies' screen which would usually have
been skipped will get more use. This has the nice feature that it
explicitly tells users what packages are being added and why. So as
not to needlessly scare users, the patch drops the &
would like to know if any blind users are using cygwin, and if so if
they could try the setup.exe interface with nvda to see if they have a
little luck with as i do.
i would think this would best be handled offlist, no point in spamming
the sighted needlessly.
Am 07.04.2010, 18:33 Uhr, schrieb Corinna Vinschen:
On Apr 7 16:01, Matthias Andree wrote:
Greetings,
I propose the attached patch to fix the two issues (installation
status truncated, copyright outdated) I reported on cygwin@ (see
forward below), and a third issue, missing lzma and gcrypt fr
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 06:33:43PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Apr 7 16:01, Matthias Andree wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I propose the attached patch to fix the two issues (installation
>> status truncated, copyright outdated) I reported on cygwin@ (see
>> forward below), and a third issue,
On Apr 7 16:01, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I propose the attached patch to fix the two issues (installation
> status truncated, copyright outdated) I reported on cygwin@ (see
> forward below), and a third issue, missing lzma and gcrypt from
> README. diffstat:
>
> ChangeLog | 11
allation status incompletely shown in Create
Icons/Installation Status screen
Setup 2.693 incompletely displays the "Installation Status" warning on the
page that also contains two checkboxes under "create Icons" on my Windows
7 machine (Professional, 32-bit, German, Segoe UI 9pt siz
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 01:31:19PM -0500, Andrew Schulman wrote:
>New Cygwin build of screen. Please upload, including setup.hint since the
>dependencies have changed (libncurses10 instead of libncurses9). Thanks,
>Andrew.
>
>wget \
> http://home.comcast.net/~andrex2/cygwin
New Cygwin build of screen. Please upload, including setup.hint since the
dependencies have changed (libncurses10 instead of libncurses9). Thanks,
Andrew.
wget \
http://home.comcast.net/~andrex2/cygwin/screen/setup.hint \
http://home.comcast.net/~andrex2/cygwin/screen/screen-4.0.3-5.tar.bz2
On 30/09/2009 10:56, Andrew Schulman wrote:
I'm promoting the current "test" versions of screen to "current". Please
upload the revised setup.hints (below) to make the change. All I've done
is to remove the test: and curr: lines from each setup.hint. Thanks,
Done.
Yaakov
I'm promoting the current "test" versions of screen to "current". Please
upload the revised setup.hints (below) to make the change. All I've done
is to remove the test: and curr: lines from each setup.hint. Thanks,
Andrew.
# 1.5
wget http://home.comcast.
list that this is a test release, especially for 1.5, and that I'll
need to see positive test reports before I move it to current.
I believe that the screen executable in the 1.5 package was compiled
against libncurses8, and I don't have a way to recompile it now, so let's
leave the
ion of recreating one. I did warn on the
cygwin list that this is a test release, especially for 1.5, and that I'll
need to see positive test reports before I move it to current.
I believe that the screen executable in the 1.5 package was compiled
against libncurses8, and I don't hav
On 25/08/2009 15:29, Andrew Schulman wrote:
I have a new release of screen, that supports 256-color terminals. The 256
color support hasn't been well tested yet, so I'm providing this as a test
release in order to get reports from users. So, the setup.hint file will
need to be updat
Ping. Thanks, Andrew.
> # 1.5
> B=http://home.comcast.net/~andrex2/cygwin/1.5/screen/
> wget \
> ${B}/setup.hint \
> ${B}/screen-4.0.3-3.tar.bz2 \
> ${B}/screen-4.0.3-3-src.tar.bz2
>
> # 1.7
> B=http://home.comcast.net/~andrex2/cygwin/screen/
> wget \
>
I have a new release of screen, that supports 256-color terminals. The 256
color support hasn't been well tested yet, so I'm providing this as a test
release in order to get reports from users. So, the setup.hint file will
need to be updated.
Please upload, for 1.5 and 1.7. Than
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:50:41AM -0500, Thrall, Bryan wrote:
>2009-05-11 Bryan Thrall
>
> * localdir.cc (load_dialog): Choose description string based on install
> type.
> * res.rc (IDD_LOCAL_DIR): Replace static description text with
> IDC_LOCAL_DIR_DESC.
> * resource.h (I
setup.exe's current local directory screen doesn't accurately describe
the purpose of the local directory when the user is installing from a
local mirror (rather than downloading or download-and-installing), which
can be confusing. The attached patch changes the description based o
At 14-8-2007 8:38, Jari Aalto wrote:
Did you see http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-08/msg00319.html ?
$ figlet -I1
20202
$ figlet -I2
fonts
in contrast to
$ figlet -I1
20200
$ figlet -I2
/usr/share/figletfonts
Not sure what happened. I recompiled the sources. Please upload.
On Aug 14 09:38, Jari Aalto wrote:
> * Mon 2007-08-13 Corinna Vinschen public.gmane.org>
> * Message-Id: 20070813073026.GT8535 AT calimero.vinschen.de
> > Did you see http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-08/msg00319.html ?
>
> Not sure what happened. I recompiled the sources. Please upload.
>
> wg
* Mon 2007-08-13 Corinna Vinschen
* Message-Id: 20070813073026.GT8535 AT calimero.vinschen.de
> Did you see http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2007-08/msg00319.html ?
>
> $ figlet -I1
> 20202
> $ figlet -I2
> fonts
>
> in contrast to
>
> $ figlet -I1
> 20200
> $ figlet -I2
> /usr/share/fi
Jaari,
On Aug 10 15:14, Eric Blake wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> According to Jari Aalto on 8/10/2007 3:01 PM:
> >>> wget\
> >>> http://cygwin.cante.net/figlet/figlet-2.2.2-1.tar.bz2 \
> >>> http://cygwin.cante.net/figlet/figlet-2.2.2-1-src.tar.bz2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Jari Aalto on 8/10/2007 3:01 PM:
>>> wget\
>>> http://cygwin.cante.net/figlet/figlet-2.2.2-1.tar.bz2 \
>>> http://cygwin.cante.net/figlet/figlet-2.2.2-1-src.tar.bz2 \
>>> http://cygwin.cante.net/figlet/setup.hint
> Ap
* Fri 2007-08-10 Corinna Vinschen
* Message-Id: 20070810192227.GO8535 AT calimero.vinschen.de
> On Aug 9 18:58, Jari Aalto wrote:
>
>> wget\
>> http://cygwin.cante.net/figlet/figlet-2.2.2-1.tar.bz2 \
>> http://cygwin.cante.net/figlet/figlet-2.2.2-1-src.tar.bz2 \
>> http://cy
On Aug 9 18:58, Jari Aalto wrote:
> wget\
> http://cygwin.cante.net/figlet/figlet-2.2.2-1.tar.bz2 \
> http://cygwin.cante.net/figlet/figlet-2.2.2-1-src.tar.bz2 \
> http://cygwin.cante.net/figlet/setup.hint
$ wget http://cygwin.cante.net/figlet/figlet-2.2.2-1.tar.bz2
http:
8T1355)" wrote:
>>>
>>>> sdesc: "Frank, Ian & Glenn's Letters (large letters on text screen)"
>>>
>>> The current sdesc is simply "Program to create large letters on text
>>> screen" and I thi
* Wed 2007-08-08 Christopher Faylor
* Message-Id: 20070808211342.GB13717 AT ednor.casa.cgf.cx
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 01:41:03PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
>
>>"Jari Aalto (Cygwin-bug#20070808T1355)" wrote:
>>
>>> sdesc: "Frank, Ian & Glenn'
On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 01:41:03PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
>"Jari Aalto (Cygwin-bug#20070808T1355)" wrote:
>
>> sdesc: "Frank, Ian & Glenn's Letters (large letters on text screen)"
>
>I don't think this is appropriate for a sdesc. This is
"Jari Aalto (Cygwin-bug#20070808T1355)" wrote:
> sdesc: "Frank, Ian & Glenn's Letters (large letters on text screen)"
I don't think this is appropriate for a sdesc. This is the *only* text
that a user will ever see about the package when using set
Adoped package from Carl Ebrey
Jari
sdesc: "Frank, Ian & Glenn's Letters (large letters on text screen)"
ldesc: "Program creates large characters out of ordinary screen characters. It
can create characters in many different styles and can kern and
"smush" th
On Jul 18 05:22, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> URL for the revised setup.hint is below. Please upload.
Done.
Thanks,
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
I've heard no negative reports about screen in the week since it came out--
in fact no testing reports at all, but I've decided to interpret that as
"people are using it and if it weren't working right I'd hear about it."
So, I'm moving it from test to current.
On Jul 10 05:55, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> Reini Urban wrote:
>
> > > wget \
> > > http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/screen/setup.hint \
> > > http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/screen/screen-4.0.3-1.tar.bz2 \
> > > http://home.comcas
Reini Urban wrote:
> > wget \
> > http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/screen/setup.hint \
> > http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/screen/screen-4.0.3-1.tar.bz2 \
> > http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/screen/screen-4.0.3-1-src.tar.bz2
>
> Package
Andrew Schulman schrieb:
...
Just the one and only cygwin app that detects it internally, naim, fails
to work with screen. But this is a naim problem, not screen.
Detects what internally? screen? So you mean that naim looks to see if
it's running in screen, and refuses to do so?
See c
me.
> Just the one and only cygwin app that detects it internally, naim, fails
> to work with screen. But this is a naim problem, not screen.
Detects what internally? screen? So you mean that naim looks to see if
it's running in screen, and refuses to do so?
A.
Andrew Schulman schrieb:
I've packaged screen for Cygwin and would like to maintain it. URLs are
below.
...
wget \
http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/screen/setup.hint \
http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/cygwin/screen/screen-4.0.3-1.tar.bz2 \
http://home.comcast.net/~andrex/c
I've packaged screen for Cygwin and would like to maintain it. URLs are
below.
screen is a terminal multiplexer and window manager that runs several
separate 'screens' on a single physical character-based terminal. Each
virtual terminal emulates a DEC VT100 plus several ANSI X3.
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
