tcp-wrappers for 1.7.0

Hi Chuck, would you mind to build a new tcp-wrappers package exclusively for 1.7.0, which has IPv6 enabled? Thanks in advance, Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat

Re: tcp-wrappers for 1.7.0

Corinna Vinschen wrote: would you mind to build a new tcp-wrappers package exclusively for 1.7.0, which has IPv6 enabled? Fairly soon. I was hoping that the setup-1.7.exe issues would get resolved soon, so that this procedure: http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2008-04/msg00299.html wasn't qu

Re: tcp-wrappers for 1.7.0

On Apr 25 00:28, Charles Wilson wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> would you mind to build a new tcp-wrappers package exclusively for >> 1.7.0, which has IPv6 enabled? > > Fairly soon. Cool, thanks. Btw., the openssh package I uploaded to the release-2 area yesterday is already using your csih-b

Re: tcp-wrappers for 1.7.0

Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Apr 25 00:28, Charles Wilson wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: Cool, thanks. Btw., the openssh package I uploaded to the release-2 area yesterday is already using your csih-based config scripts. Neat-o. Keeping fingers crossed... I guess next I should turn of Addres

Re: tcp-wrappers for 1.7.0

On Apr 25 13:32, Charles Wilson wrote: > Ideas for cygwin-1.9 (not a new one): > (1) add ld.so functionality to cygwin2.dll > (2) ...miracle happens where cygwin .exe's and cygwin .dll's can > simultaneously have all symbols satisfied, yet not be linked directly to > DLLs other than cygwin2.dll a

Re: tcp-wrappers for 1.7.0

Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Wasn't there a guy on the cygwin ML a couple of weeks ago who claimed > to have solved the problem with unresolved symbols? There was some > shoulder patting on the list, but nothing came out of it so far, right? That would be FlexDLL:

Re: tcp-wrappers for 1.7.0

Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Apr 25 13:32, Charles Wilson wrote: Ideas for cygwin-1.9 (not a new one): (1) add ld.so functionality to cygwin2.dll (2) ...miracle happens where cygwin .exe's and cygwin .dll's can simultaneously have all symbols satisfied, yet not be linked directly to DLLs other t

Re: tcp-wrappers for 1.7.0

On Apr 25 15:28, Charles Wilson wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> Step 2 reminds me of the South Park underpants gnomes' business plan. >> Didn't see this one. Do you have a pointer to the episode? > > The Plan: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Gnomes_plan.png > > The Episode "Gnomes": > ht

Re: tcp-wrappers for 1.7.0

Charles Wilson wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: Cool, thanks. Btw., the openssh package I uploaded to the release-2 area yesterday is already using your csih-based config scripts. Neat-o. Keeping fingers crossed... Looks like the package is missing /etc/defaults/etc/inetd.d/sshd-inetd -- Ch

Re: tcp-wrappers for 1.7.0

On Apr 27 02:04, Charles Wilson wrote: > Charles Wilson wrote: >> Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> Cool, thanks. Btw., the openssh package I uploaded to the release-2 >>> area yesterday is already using your csih-based config scripts. >> Neat-o. Keeping fingers crossed... > > Looks like the package is

Re: tcp-wrappers for 1.7.0

Corinna Vinschen wrote: would you mind to build a new tcp-wrappers package exclusively for 1.7.0, which has IPv6 enabled? tcp_wrappers-7.6-5 uploaded to release-2. Should we announce these to cygwin-announce, or not? And if so, should they be flagged in the announcement as cygwin-1.7 only?

Re: tcp-wrappers for 1.7.0

On Apr 27 20:29, Charles Wilson wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> would you mind to build a new tcp-wrappers package exclusively for >> 1.7.0, which has IPv6 enabled? > > tcp_wrappers-7.6-5 uploaded to release-2. > > Should we announce these to cygwin-announce, or not? And if so, should > they