On Sun, 8 May 2005, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > Max Bowsher writes:
> >
> > > In this way, there will be some visible indication in setup.exe that
> > > progress is occurring.
> >
> > I see what you mean, but that's quite a hack. What about having setup
> > display some prog
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Max Bowsher writes:
In this way, there will be some visible indication in setup.exe that
progress is occurring.
I see what you mean, but that's quite a hack. What about having setup
display some progress indication based on the amount of console output
that is printed?
How
Max Bowsher writes:
> In this way, there will be some visible indication in setup.exe that
> progress is occurring.
I see what you mean, but that's quite a hack. What about having setup
display some progress indication based on the amount of console output
that is printed?
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwen
In order to give the user a little progress feedback, I suggest that
post-texmf.sh be split into post-texmf-stage1.sh, -stage2.sh, etc.
In this way, there will be some visible indication in setup.exe that
progress is occurring.
Max.
