Re: upload protocol

2012-10-10 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Oct 9 12:58, Christopher Faylor wrote: Would it make sense to always wait for an RFU after an ITP? As an uploader, I'd rather not have to scan conversations for clues for when a package is ready for upload. I was actually waiting for Jari to send an RFU for the packages that he'd

Re: upload protocol

2012-10-10 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 03:31:51AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: On 10/9/2012 10:58 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: Would it make sense to always wait for an RFU after an ITP? That's how I thought it always worked. To my mind, ITP is only a trial run, asking experienced packagers to test that

Re: upload protocol

2012-10-10 Thread David Stacey
On 10/10/12 10:31, Warren Young wrote: As it happens, I think this sort of gun-jumping happened with the Doxygen 1.8.0-1 packages. I gave a GTG with reservations to the ITP, several days ago. David said in the thread he was off working on addressing some of those reservations, but then

Re: upload protocol

2012-10-10 Thread Warren Young
On 10/10/2012 11:46 AM, David Stacey wrote: As a newbie, I didn't know whether to wait for more comments, or to submit a [RFU] (as I'd been given a GTG) All of the discussion was questions of whether, not how or why. So, I think you should have just made the changes you wanted to make, and

upload protocol

2012-10-09 Thread Christopher Faylor
Would it make sense to always wait for an RFU after an ITP? As an uploader, I'd rather not have to scan conversations for clues for when a package is ready for upload. I was actually waiting for Jari to send an RFU for the packages that he'd recently ITP'ed but, now that I think of it, maybe

Re: upload protocol (Use of GTG?)

2012-10-09 Thread Jari Aalto
On 2012-10-09 12:58, Christopher Faylor wrote: | Would it make sense to always wait for an RFU after an ITP? | As an uploader, I'd rather not have to scan conversations for clues | for when a package is ready for upload. Perhaps appending GTG to a end of subject would be all that is needed to

Re: upload protocol (Use of GTG?)

2012-10-09 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:30:30PM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote: On 2012-10-09 12:58, Christopher Faylor wrote: | Would it make sense to always wait for an RFU after an ITP? | As an uploader, I'd rather not have to scan conversations for clues | for when a package is ready for upload. Perhaps

Re: upload protocol

2012-10-09 Thread marco atzeri
On 10/9/2012 6:58 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: Would it make sense to always wait for an RFU after an ITP? As an uploader, I'd rather not have to scan conversations for clues for when a package is ready for upload. I was actually waiting for Jari to send an RFU for the packages that he'd