Re: [PATCH]Package extention recognition (revision 1)

2002-01-24 Thread Michael A Chase
- Original Message - From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 17:51 Subject: Re: [PATCH]Package extention recognition > On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 05:48:35PM -0800, Michael A Chase wrote: > >I noticed that find_tar_ext() always

Re: [PATCH]Package extention recognition

2002-01-24 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 05:48:35PM -0800, Michael A Chase wrote: >I noticed that find_tar_ext() always returns after checking for ".tar.bz2" >and ".tar.gz" so it never gets to the check for ".tar". As long as I was >fixing that, it seemed like a good time to add ".cwp" as an accepted file >extens

[PATCH]Package extention recognition

2002-01-24 Thread Michael A Chase
I noticed that find_tar_ext() always returns after checking for ".tar.bz2" and ".tar.gz" so it never gets to the check for ".tar". As long as I was fixing that, it seemed like a good time to add ".cwp" as an accepted file extension. I also updated the code in fromcwd.cc so it can accept any exte

Re: patch to allow newlib to compile when winsup not present

2002-01-24 Thread Robert Collins
Further to this, IMO emulation & platform specific headers should be in the winsup dir. libc and libm headers should be in newlib. The pthread typedef's are emulation specific, not newlib specific, and I strongly oppose them being moved to newlib. The function definitions (like pthread_kill) how

Re: patch to allow newlib to compile when winsup not present

2002-01-24 Thread Robert Collins
On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 06:48, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote: > On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 12:49, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > What's wrong with saying that you need the winsup directory or a cygwin > > installation to compile the cygwin versions of newlib? > > > > That is a possibility, but even in that

Re: patch to allow newlib to compile when winsup not present

2002-01-24 Thread Thomas Fitzsimmons
On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 12:49, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 12:07:15PM -0500, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote: > >On Wed, 2002-01-23 at 22:34, Robert Collins wrote: > >> > >> === > >> - Original Message - > >> From: "Thomas Fitzsimmons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To: <[EMAIL P

Re: patch to allow newlib to compile when winsup not present

2002-01-24 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 12:07:15PM -0500, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote: >On Wed, 2002-01-23 at 22:34, Robert Collins wrote: >> >> === >> - Original Message - >> From: "Thomas Fitzsimmons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Thursday, January 24,

Re: patch to allow newlib to compile when winsup not present

2002-01-24 Thread Thomas Fitzsimmons
On Wed, 2002-01-23 at 22:34, Robert Collins wrote: > > === > - Original Message - > From: "Thomas Fitzsimmons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:08 PM > Subject: patch to allow newlib to compile when winsup not pr

setup.exe command line options

2002-01-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've attached the diffs for the work in progress implementation of command line options. I've tried to copy the dialog's terminology when choosing the options and the variables used within WinMain. I'm using the PropertyPage Create functions as my interface. In many instances the Create function