On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 13:58, Michael A Chase wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 17:51
> Subject: Re: [PATCH]Package extention recognition
>
>
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 05:48:35PM -0
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael A Chase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 00:53
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Package extention recognition (revision 1)
> On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 13:58, Michael A Chase wrote:
> >
On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 20:44, Michael A Chase wrote:
> - Original Message -
> ".bz2" only 'protects' WinZip users until WinZip starts handling bzip2
> files. That may never happen, but ".cwp" (or ".rpm" or ".deb") isn't
> vulnerable to WinZip improvements.
.cwp is hardly protection, it's
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael A Chase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 02:04
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Package extention recognition (revision 1)
> On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 20:44, Michael A Chase wrote:
> >
I think this covers all your concerns. If not, I'll fix it in the morning.
--
Mac :})
** I normally forward private questions to the appropriate mail list. **
Give a hobbit a fish and he eats fish for a day.
Give a hobbit a ring and he eats fish for an age.
ChangeLog:
2002-01-25 Michael A Chas
On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 21:42, Michael A Chase wrote:
> I think this covers all your concerns. If not, I'll fix it in the morning.
Close, I'll tidy the last bit up.
The ? ext-path:0's are important because they ensure that the string
isn't part of a filename like:
foo.tar.bz2-patch or something
And that test is still there, I moved it into the if () so something like
".tar.bz2" wouldn't trigger the return : 0; If all the ifs fail,
return 0; still occurs.
--
Mac :})
** I normally forward private questions to the appropriate mail list. **
Give a hobbit a fish and he eats fish for a d
On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 21:59, Michael A Chase wrote:
> And that test is still there, I moved it into the if () so something like
> ".tar.bz2" wouldn't trigger the return : 0; If all the ifs fail,
> return 0; still occurs.
*blush*
2002-01-25 Jonathan Kamens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* include/winuser.h: Define ENUM_CURRENT_SETTINGS and
ENUM_REGISTRY_SETTINGS for use in calls to EnumDisplaySettings.
Index: winuser.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/winsu
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 02:59:17AM -0800, Michael A Chase wrote:
>And that test is still there, I moved it into the if () so something like
>".tar.bz2" wouldn't trigger the return : 0; If all the ifs fail,
>return 0; still occurs.
Hmm. Seems like someone has "improved" this code from when
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 09:24
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Package extention recognition (revision 2)
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 02:59:17AM -0800, Michael A Chase wrote:
> >And that test is still the
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 10:06:30AM -0800, Michael A Chase wrote:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 09:24
>Subject: Re: [PATCH]Package extention recognition (revision 2)
>
>
>>On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 a
My fault, we discussed this on cygwin-apps when you where adding package
support to cygcheck.
I was looking for a clear and easy to read solution ;}. I don't think
that supporting foo.tar.bz2.tar.bz2 needs to be an objective though :}.
Rob
===
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Fayl
===
- Original Message -
From: "J. Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> No overwhelming reason, however, historically there are already
precedences for
> this. Newlib already contains system-specific and machine-specific
header
> files and a system for overriding the common ones. It suppose
On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 17:53, Robert Collins wrote:
>
> Hmm, I wonder if
> #ifndef pthread_t
> #error pthread_t hasn't be specified for this platform, do you have the
> kernel includes available?
> #endif
>
> will catch a missing typedef correctly? Assuming it won't, the correct
> define to check
Looks good to me.
Rob
===
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Fitzsimmons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "J. Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2002 12:53 PM
Subject: Patch to fail with erro
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 08:53:42PM -0500, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
>On Fri, 2002-01-25 at 17:53, Robert Collins wrote:
>>
>> Hmm, I wonder if
>> #ifndef pthread_t
>> #error pthread_t hasn't be specified for this platform, do you have the
>> kernel includes available?
>> #endif
>>
>> will catch
===
- Original Message -
From: "Michael A Chase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Package extention recognition (revision 2)
> I think this covers all your concerns. If not, I'll fix it in the
morning.
Committed.
R
18 matches
Mail list logo
