On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 11:07:09PM -, Chris January wrote:
>The attached patch (against cygwin-1.3.9-1/winsup/cygwin) adds support for a
>/proc virtual filesystem and a read-only version of /proc/registry. I've
>read http://cygwin.com/assign.txt but need to sort out the legalese before
>doing
The attached patch (against cygwin-1.3.9-1/winsup/cygwin) adds support for a
/proc virtual filesystem and a read-only version of /proc/registry. I've
read http://cygwin.com/assign.txt but need to sort out the legalese before
doing anything.
Partically fufills Cygwin TODO item:
2001-11-08/proc
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 04:05:42PM +0100, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > Me neither. Perhaps it's ok to implement it just based on the
> > description (if any and if it's at all possible)?!?
>
> For NT and 95: every interface which is not ppp is co
I've looked the patch over and don't see any obvious problems. My technical
knowledge of C++ has some severe limits though.
It might be better to have rebase in some of the names; rebase_config
instead of config_file for example.
--
Mac :})
** I normally forward private questions to the appropri
