On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:51:31PM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
2003-02-17 Vaclav Haisman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* include/winioctl.h (FSCTL_SET_SPARSE): Define.
2003-02-18 Vaclav Haisman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* wincap.h (wincaps::supports_sparse_files): New flag.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:06:37PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Since st_blocks contains the number of blocks allocated, according to
the Linux man page and SUSv3, shouldn't we change st_blocks to reflect
the value of GetCompressedFileSize() now?
I've checked in a patch so st_blocks is now
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 11:59:11PM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
2003-02-19 Vaclav Haisman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* winsup.api/crlf.c: Fix C signed/unsigned compare warning.
* winsup.api/mmaptest01.c: Ditto.
* winsup.api/ltp/chmod01.c: Ditto.
* winsup.api/ltp/fork04.c:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 11:16:06AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:51:31PM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
2003-02-17 Vaclav Haisman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* include/winioctl.h (FSCTL_SET_SPARSE): Define.
2003-02-18 Vaclav Haisman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:25:00AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 11:16:06AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
I've applied that patch now. If anybody still has problems with it,
please feel free to post a *testcase* which shows the problem.
Um. I was still hoping
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 04:52:22PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
However, since some people were objecting so doggedly, I was thinking
that committing this patch would give a hint that a testcase(tm) is more
useful than just musing. Everybody who wants this patch removed can
accomplish this by
Hi,
this patch silents warnings about strict-aliasing rules breach.
There are also two hunks that remove obviously always true assert().
Vaclav Haisman
2003-02-20 Vaclav Haisman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* libc/stdio/vfprintf.c (cvt): Fix strict-aliasing rules
breach warning.
Corinna,
Here is a patch with a new implementation of access() using AccessCheck.
Compared to the old version, the readonly attribute and the deny ace's
are taken into account, and the function does not rely on /etc/passwd
nor on /etc/group. It also seems to be somewhat faster.
I was wondering
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 08:15:34PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
2) I am not sure when to use LoadDLLfuncEx vs. LoadDLLfunc.
LoadDLLfunc issues an error if a function isn't found. LoadDllFuncEx
lets you return an error code when the function isn't found.
cgf
