On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 08:02:58AM +0100, COTTO Daniel FTRD/DMI/CAE wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have made a patch to the cygwin1.dll .
> Its main purpose is to allow a nul character to be input from a french keyboard.
> Also this patch adds some othre functions keys. If you are interrested you have the
Because I do the changes at home for my hobby , I will probably send
this patch to red-hat aproval system this week-end. So for your
question, Actually, the cygwin terminal have: esc [ D for normal shift
et ctrl, esc esc [ D for alt. I can change this to the xterm
conformences. If you have a spec
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 10:42:30AM +0100, COTTO Daniel FTRD/DMI/CAE wrote:
> Because I do the changes at home for my hobby , I will probably send
> this patch to red-hat aproval system this week-end. So for your
Sorry but you seem to misunderstand. We all are working voluntarily
on Cygwin, all in
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 08:09:02PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> Corinna,
>
> Here is a patch to have fhandler_socket::dup return success
> or failure (related to the problem seen by Jason Tishler).
Thanks. We still don't know *why* that happens, though. That bugs me.
Anyway, I've made a c
OK, thank you for the explanations.
I'll do what it needed for contributing to cygwin like I have already
said. I have just thought that my patch was non significant enough to be
a meber of the cygwin contributors.
-Message d'origine-
De : Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoye
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 01:10:19PM +0100, COTTO Daniel FTRD/DMI/CAE wrote:
> OK, thank you for the explanations.
> I'll do what it needed for contributing to cygwin like I have already
> said. I have just thought that my patch was non significant enough to be
> a meber of the cygwin contributors.
I'm member to the cygwin-patches list at now.
-Message d'origine-
De : Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoye : mardi 11 mars 2003 14:02
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc : COTTO Daniel FTRD/DMI/CAE
Objet : Re: A patch for the cygwin1.dll console handler
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 01:10:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> I'm seriously concidering to remove all the fixup_before/fixup_after
> from fhandler_socket::dup() and just call fhandler_base::dup() on
> NT systems.
Corinna,
Isn't that just what you do now?
Just out of curiosity, why hasn't this always been done? I blindly thought
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 09:43:35AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> > I'm seriously concidering to remove all the fixup_before/fixup_after
> > from fhandler_socket::dup() and just call fhandler_base::dup() on
> > NT systems.
>
> Corinna,
>
> Isn't that just what yo
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Thanks. We still don't know *why* that happens, though. That bugs me.
For future reference here is what happens in Jason's experiments.
All of them start in the system service environment and do as follows
A) [optional] call gethostname to initialize wsock
B) setgid/s
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 04:20:28PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 09:43:35AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm seriously concidering to remove all the fixup_before/fixup_after
>> > from fhandler_socket::dup() and just call fhandler_bas
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 03:44:38PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 04:20:28PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 09:43:35AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> >> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I'm seriously concidering to remove all the fixup_
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 11:49:27PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 03:44:38PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 04:20:28PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 09:43:35AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>> >> Corinna Vinschen w
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 06:19:15PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 11:49:27PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 03:44:38PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> Should I put this in 1.3.21? It's not too late.
> >
> >Yes, please, that would be prob
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 12:38:01AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 06:19:15PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 11:49:27PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>>On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 03:44:38PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Should I put this in
At 04:20 PM 3/11/2003 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> > I'm seriously concidering to remove all the fixup_before/fixup_after
>> > from fhandler_socket::dup() and just call fhandler_base::dup() on
>> > NT systems.
Corinna,
I like that and I have pushed the logic to also do it on Win9X, without
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 12:15:25AM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>At 04:20 PM 3/11/2003 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
>>> > I'm seriously concidering to remove all the fixup_before/fixup_after
>>> > from fhandler_socket::dup() and just call fhandler_base::dup() on
>>> > NT systems.
>
>Corinna,
17 matches
Mail list logo
