On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 10:05:09AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 09:11:34PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 08:46:06PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> > > >This is the first in a series of patches fixing s
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 11:54:26PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> 2003-09-10 Pierre Humblet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * shared_info.h (shared_info::initialize): Remove argument.
> * cygheap.h (cygheap_user::init): New declaration.
> * uinfo.cc (cygheap_user::init): New.
>
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> Looks good to me, except for:
>
> > - char name[UNLEN + 1] = "";
> > + char name[UNLEN > 127 ? UNLEN + 1 : 128] = "";
>
> Huh? Why that? UNLEN is defined as 256 in lmcons.h so I don't understand
> the reasoning behind that complexity.
>
Just being paranoid. "name
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 09:36:05AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> > Looks good to me, except for:
> >
> > > - char name[UNLEN + 1] = "";
> > > + char name[UNLEN > 127 ? UNLEN + 1 : 128] = "";
> >
> > Huh? Why that? UNLEN is defined as 256 in lmcons.h so I don
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 09:36:05AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > >
> > > Looks good to me, except for:
> > >
> > > > - char name[UNLEN + 1] = "";
> > > > + char name[UNLEN > 127 ? UNLEN + 1 : 128] = "";
> > >
> > > Huh? Why that? UN
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 12:50:34PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 09:36:05AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
> > > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Looks good to me, except for:
> > > >
> > > > > - char name[UNLEN + 1] = "";
> > >
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 09:15:51PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 12:50:34PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>> OK, do you want to change that back and check it in?
>> Otherwise I will do it tonight.
>
>Just do it tonight.
I'll check it in now. I'm generating a snapshot
Each Cygwin process publishes information about itself
(e.g. pid, ppid, uid, gid, ...) in a _pinfo file mapping.
Currently Everyone has write access to the _pinfo file mapping.
Thus Everyone can change a process uid and gid.
By changing its uid and gid, one can trick a daemon into
logging in a
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 12:05:42AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>The flag PID_MAP_RW is added in the few pinfo constructors
>that need to be write into _pinfo if it exists.
>[snip]
>diff -u -p -r1.166 exceptions.cc
>--- exceptions.cc 10 Sep 2003 17:26:12 - 1.166
>+++ exceptions.cc
At 12:15 AM 9/11/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 12:05:42AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>>The flag PID_MAP_RW is added in the few pinfo constructors
>>that need to be write into _pinfo if it exists.
>>[snip]
>>diff -u -p -r1.166 exceptions.cc
>>--- exceptions.cc 10 Sep 2003
The following patch to the /dev/dsp sound device does the following:
- implements SNDCTL_DSP_SETFRAGMENT, allowing smaller sound buffers to be used.
- trivially implements SNDCTL_DSP_CHANNELS.
- opens and closes the class device upon SNDCTL_DSP_RESET.
- Uses win32 event to signal buffer out
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 12:29:12PM +0800, peter garrone wrote:
>
> The following patch to the /dev/dsp sound device does the following:
>
> - implements SNDCTL_DSP_SETFRAGMENT, allowing smaller sound buffers to be used.
> - trivially implements SNDCTL_DSP_CHANNELS.
> - opens and closes the class d
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 12:27:00AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>At 12:15 AM 9/11/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>>On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 12:05:42AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>>>The flag PID_MAP_RW is added in the few pinfo constructors
>>>that need to be write into _pinfo if it exists.
>>>[snip
13 matches
Mail list logo
