At 01:27 AM 5/11/2005 +, Eric Blake wrote:
>> At 11:11 AM 5/10/2005 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>> So I restrained mkdir to only act on FH_FS.
>>
>> Ideally mkdir & rmdir should be part of the various handlers, but
>> there is no current payoff in doing so as directories can only be
>
At 11:11 AM 5/10/2005 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>Could we see this as a unified-diff please?
Oops, but in retrospect it's a good thing. I did some more tests.
If c:\dev exists, then mkdir /dev/tty created c:\dev\tty (ditto
for the other /dev/xxx ), but rmdir /dev/tty would not delete
c:\d
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 08:16:36PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>At 06:19 PM 5/9/2005 +, Eric Blake wrote:
>
>>Second, the sequence chdir("//"), mkdir("machine") creates machine in the
>>current directory.
>
>Old bug.
>chdir("/proc"), mkdir("machine") produces the same result.
>And mkdir("
