Corinna Vinschen wrote:
2005-05-17 Brian Dessent [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://cygwin.com/acronyms#PCYMTNQREAIYR ;-)
Yeah, I know. Spammers have had my address for some time, I don't feel
like hiding. Me heart SpamAssassin. :)
Close all Cygwin command prompts, xterms, etc. and stop the
Here is the implementation of mkdir and rmdir with fhandlers.
To prepare the day where proc_registry will allow writes,
I have removed setting PATH_RO and an error return from path.cc
(it's all handled in the fhandlers).
I have also removed obsolete code about fhandler_cygdrive.
There is another
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Alright. I am not sure how to push out the new version to the web site,
so someone else will have to do that (or tell me what to do - check in
the .html files into the website CVS or something?)
Yep. cvs -d :ext:cygwin.com:/cvs/cygwin co htdocs
Got it, thanks.
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
While this might help to avoid... something, I'm seriously wondering
what's wrong with this expression. Why does each new version of gcc
add new incompatibilities?
I think I've figured this out. PR/13684 added thread safety to
initialization of local statics.[1] It
I usually don't write you guys, I follow the thread to see how development
is going.
Just a note. The ls command is't quite right.
Ls -lRC wil not recursively list the files and directories in verbose mode.
The l flag seems to be ignored.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Additional note
ls -lRC - not working
ls -RCl - working
If you point out the source I will fix it.
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 10:09:35PM -0700, Vance Turner wrote:
Additional note
ls -lRC - not working
ls -RCl - working
If you point out the source I will fix it.
1) This is not a bug reporting list.
2) This does not, as far as I can tell, have anything to do with the
subject of this message.
