I should have googled a bit more before I sent the patch. It seems that even
though xchg could be used it is not being used becasue it is slower than
cmpxchg imlementation of InterlockedExchange. I thus withdraw the patch.
VH.
On Tue, 31 May 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 200
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 12:52:26AM +0200, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
>I think that ilockexch() in winbase.h should look like what is in my
>patch. Explicit lock prefix is not needed because xchg instruction
>sets LOCK# signal implicitly.
A similar implementation in the linux kernel seems to disagree w
I think that ilockexch() in winbase.h should look like what is in my patch.
Explicit lock prefix is not needed because xchg instruction sets LOCK# signal
implicitly.
VH.Index: winbase.h
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/winsup/cygwin/winbas
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 04:04:58PM +0200, Martin Koeppe wrote:
>> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 01:39:04AM +0200, Martin Koeppe wrote:
>> >Hello,
>> >
>> >I recently found out that you cannot create hardlinks
>> >on mounted network shares with cygwin
>> >(error: No such file or directory),
>> >but you ca
> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 01:39:04AM +0200, Martin Koeppe wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >I recently found out that you cannot create hardlinks
> >on mounted network shares with cygwin
> >(error: No such file or directory),
> >but you can do it with the ln.exe from Interix.
> >
> >So I looked at it and fou
