As mentioned on cygwin (hopefully I'm not falling afoul of trivial patch size,
since I don't have assignment; and hopefully gmane didn't kill this):
2005-07-05 Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* cygcheck.cc (track_down, cygcheck): Return true on success.
(main): Reflect cygcheck
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 08:49:06PM +, Eric Blake wrote:
@@ -1677,7 +1681,7 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
{
if (i)
puts ();
- cygcheck (argv[i]);
+ ok = cygcheck (argv[i]);
Why are you anding the result here? Why not just set ok = cygcheck (...)?
cgf
Christopher Faylor cgf-no-personal-reply-please at cygwin.com writes:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 08:49:06PM +, Eric Blake wrote:
at at -1677,7 +1681,7 at at main (int argc, char **argv)
{
if (i)
puts ();
- cygcheck (argv[i]);
+ ok = cygcheck