RE: [PATCH] Add -p option to ps command

> Original Message > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add -p option to ps command > From: Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, February 16, 2006 10:09 am > To: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com > > On Feb 16 07:58, Jerry D. Hedden wrote: > > Thanks. I realized one minor oversight. Usi

Re: [PATCH] cygcheck: follow symbolic links

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Feb 13 13:44, Igor Peshansky wrote: > > As promised in , the > > attached patch teaches cygcheck to follow symlinks when looking for > > executables, and also flags scripts. Sorry, had legal delay

Re: [PATCH] cygcheck: follow symbolic links

On Feb 13 13:44, Igor Peshansky wrote: > As promised in , the > attached patch teaches cygcheck to follow symlinks when looking for > executables, and also flags scripts. Sorry, had legal delays in sending > this (as you can see, I had this workin

Re: [PATCH] Add -p option to ps command

On Feb 16 07:58, Jerry D. Hedden wrote: > Thanks. I realized one minor oversight. Using -p should imply -a so > that even if the PID is not owned by the current user, it will still > get listed. I've attached a patch for this (just a one line addition) > that builds on top of the previous patch

RE: [PATCH] Add -p option to ps command

> On Feb 14 07:12, Jerry D. Hedden wrote: > > Attached is a patch to add a -p option to the ps command to show > > information for only a single PID: ps -p PID > Corrina Vinschen replied: > Thanks for the patch. It's barely short enough so that we decided to > put it in despite the fact that you

Re: [PATCH] Add -p option to ps command

On Feb 14 07:12, Jerry D. Hedden wrote: > Attached is a patch to add a -p option to the ps command to show > information for only a single PID: ps -p PID > This option is available on other implementations of ps (e.g., Solaris). Thanks for the patch. It's barely short enough so that we decided t