Re: Bug in cmalloc? Was: Re: Problems with: Improvements to fork handling (2/5)

2011-05-30 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:27:45PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 01:51:35AM -0400, Ryan Johnson wrote: So, I defined this small function: static void break_cmalloc(int depth, int maxdepth) { void* x = cmalloc (HEAP_2_DLL, 32); cfree(x); if (depth

Re: Bug in cmalloc? Was: Re: Problems with: Improvements to fork handling (2/5)

2011-05-30 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 02:24:49AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:27:45PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 01:51:35AM -0400, Ryan Johnson wrote: So, I defined this small function: static void break_cmalloc(int depth, int maxdepth) { void*

Re: [PATCH] tcsetpgrp fails unexpectedly

2011-05-30 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 09:45:09AM -0700, Tor Perkins wrote: 2011-03-28 Tor Perkins * fhandler_termios.cc (fhandler_termios::bg_check): Do not return EIO when a process group has no leader as this is allowed and does not imply an orphaned process group. Add a test for orphaned process

Re: Bug in cmalloc? Was: Re: Problems with: Improvements to fork handling (2/5)

2011-05-30 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 02:53:51AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: Actually, I checked in patch 2/5. That completes the set, I think. Nope. I still have to do 4/5. I WILL do that when after sleeping first. cgf

Re: Bug in cmalloc? Was: Re: Problems with: Improvements to fork handling (2/5)

2011-05-30 Thread Ryan Johnson
On 30/05/2011 2:24 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:27:45PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 01:51:35AM -0400, Ryan Johnson wrote: So, I defined this small function: static void break_cmalloc(int depth, int maxdepth) { void* x = cmalloc