[PATCH 1/2] Clarify FAQ 1.5 What version of Cygwin is this, anyway?

Relate Cygwin DLL to Unix kernel, add required options to command examples, differentiate Unix and Cygwin commands; mention that the cygwin package contains the DLL. --- faq/faq.html | 34 -- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/faq/f

[PATCH 2/2] Clarify FAQ 1.5 What version of Cygwin is this, anyway? Relate Cygwin DLL to Unix kernel, add required options to command examples, differentiate Unix and Cygwin commands; mention that the

--- faq/faq.html | 25 ++--- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/faq/faq.html b/faq/faq.html index 846e087e..8659db5d 100644 --- a/faq/faq.html +++ b/faq/faq.html @@ -57,10 +57,12 @@ freedoms, so it is free software. 1.5. What version of Cygwin

[PATCH] Fix incorrect sign-extension of pointer in 32-bit acl __to_entry

I have some code where the acl_t returned by get_file_acl is allocated at 0x80038248. As a result the acl_entry_t generated by acl_get_entry has an "index" of -1, since the pointer was sign-extended to 64-bits. My fix is trivial and simply casts the pointer to uintptr_t first. All best, David

Re: [PATCH 1/2] fhandler_proc.cc(format_proc_cpuinfo): add microcode registry lookup values

On Jul 7 13:00, Brian Inglis wrote: > Re: CPU microcode reported wrong in /proc/cpuinfo > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/cygwin/2020-May/245063.html > earlier Windows releases used different registry values to store microcode > revisions depending on the MSR name being used to get microcode

Re: Cygwin 3.1.6

On Jul 6 16:01, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote: > On 7/6/2020 3:50 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > Do you have anything in the loop which should go into 3.1.6? > > > > Given > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=newlib-cygwin.git;a=commitdiff;h=bb96bd0, > > I'd like to release