On Oct 13 18:36, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 13/10/2020 13:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Oct 12 20:29, Jon Turney wrote:
> > > This used to turn off -nostdinc on a per-file basis, but has no effect
> > > since 4c36016b.
> >
> > I'd prefer a longer SHA-1, at least 12 chars. Maybe we should
>
> Wi
On Oct 13 09:11, Brian Inglis wrote:
> Add linux-next 5.9 cpuinfo flag for Intel enqcmd/s instructions:
> x86/cpufeatures: Enumerate ENQCMD and ENQCMDS instructions:
> Work submission instruction comes in two flavors. ENQCMD can be called
> both in ring 3 and ring 0 and always uses the contents of
On 13/10/2020 13:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Oct 12 20:29, Jon Turney wrote:
This used to turn off -nostdinc on a per-file basis, but has no effect
since 4c36016b.
I'd prefer a longer SHA-1, at least 12 chars. Maybe we should
With ~20K commits in the repository, the chance of a hash coll
On Oct 13 13:18, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> On 10/13/2020 7:28 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Oct 4 12:49, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> >> A successful connection can be indicated by STATUS_SUCCESS or
> >> STATUS_PIPE_CONNECTED.
> >
> > THanks for catching but... huh? How
Add linux-next 5.9 cpuinfo flag for Intel enqcmd/s instructions:
x86/cpufeatures: Enumerate ENQCMD and ENQCMDS instructions:
Work submission instruction comes in two flavors. ENQCMD can be called
both in ring 3 and ring 0 and always uses the contents of a PASID MSR
when shipping the command to the
On 10/13/2020 7:28 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Oct 4 12:49, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
>> A successful connection can be indicated by STATUS_SUCCESS or
>> STATUS_PIPE_CONNECTED.
>
> THanks for catching but... huh? How does Windows generate two different
> status codes for the same
On Sep 24 16:39, Mingye Wang (Artoria2e5) wrote:
> On 2020/9/7 17:39, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> > Nope, we won't do that. The command line parsing is an internal
> > thing, and we won't export arbitrary internal functions using
> > their own symbol. *If* we should export this stuff at all, w
On Oct 12 20:29, Jon Turney wrote:
> Some Makefile.in and configure.ac cleanups and de-cruftification. This is
> preparatory to an Automakeification series still being worked on.
>
> For ease of reviewing, this patch doesn't contain changes to generated files
> which would be made by a autoreconf
On Oct 12 20:29, Jon Turney wrote:
> This used to turn off -nostdinc on a per-file basis, but has no effect
> since 4c36016b.
I'd prefer a longer SHA-1, at least 12 chars. Maybe we should
add a "Fixes: ..." along the lines of the Linux kernel from now on?
Ideally we'd get rid of ccwrap/c++wrap,
On Oct 7 18:55, Thomas Wolff wrote:
> It seems that ambiguous-wide behaviour (i.e. double-width property for
> characters in the East Asian Ambiguous width category) for CJK locales with
> UTF-8 encoding is inconsistent with Linux locale definitions.
> The attached patch changes that. Characters l
On Oct 8 17:36, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> On 10/4/2020 12:49 PM, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> > I'm about to push these. Corinna, please check them when you return.
> > The only difference between v2 and v1 is that there are a few more
> > fixes.
> >
> > I'm trying to help g
On Sep 12 04:11, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 20:57:06 +0200
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Sep 12 03:37, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> > > On Sat, 12 Sep 2020 02:38:43 +0900
> > > Takashi Yano via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> > > > How about the patch attac
On Oct 4 12:49, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> A successful connection can be indicated by STATUS_SUCCESS or
> STATUS_PIPE_CONNECTED.
THanks for catching but... huh? How does Windows generate two different
status codes for the same result from the same function?
Corinna
On Oct 4 12:49, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> I'm about to push these. Corinna, please check them when you return.
> The only difference between v2 and v1 is that there are a few more
> fixes.
>
> I'm trying to help get the AF_UNIX development going again. I'm
> mostly working on the to
On Sep 24 15:04, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 24/09/2020 00:52, Ken Brown via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> > This was added as a temporary measure in commit e18f7f99 because it
> > wasn't yet in the mingw-w64 headers. With one exception, it is now in
> > the current release of the headers (version 8.0.0), so
15 matches
Mail list logo