On Jul 17 17:41, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 17 16:21, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jul 17 12:51, Jon Turney wrote:
> > > On 17/07/2023 12:05, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/winsup/cygwin/thread.cc b/winsup/cygwin/thread.cc
> > > > index f614e01c42f6..fceb9bda1806 100644
> > >
On Jul 17 16:21, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 17 12:51, Jon Turney wrote:
> > On 17/07/2023 12:05, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > diff --git a/winsup/cygwin/thread.cc b/winsup/cygwin/thread.cc
> > > index f614e01c42f6..fceb9bda1806 100644
> > > --- a/winsup/cygwin/thread.cc
> > > +++
On Jul 17 16:04, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 17 12:51, Jon Turney wrote:
> > Perhaps there is a better way to write a test that async cancellation works
> > in the absence of cancellation points, but it eludes me...
>
> Same here, so just go ahead.
Actually, it's not just that. I think
On Jul 17 12:51, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 17/07/2023 12:05, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jul 14 20:57, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > What if Cygwin checks for a deferred cancellation in pthread::exit,
> > > too? It needs to do this by its own, not calling pthread::testcancel,
> > > otherwise
On Jul 17 12:51, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 14/07/2023 14:04, Jon Turney wrote:
> > On 13/07/2023 19:53, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > > > > normally after 10 seconds. (See the commentary in pthread::cancel()
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > thread.cc, where it checks if the target thread is inside the
>
Hi Jon,
On Jul 17 12:58, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 13/07/2023 12:38, Jon Turney wrote:
> >
> > cancel11: some funkiness I can't work out, causing the save/restoring
> > signal handlers around system() to not
> > work correctly
>
> So, the test here: is the SIGINT handle restored correctly if the
On 13/07/2023 12:38, Jon Turney wrote:
cancel11: some funkiness I can't work out, causing the save/restoring signal
handlers around system() to not
work correctly
So, the test here: is the SIGINT handle restored correctly if the thread
executing system() is cancelled. This test fails,
On 17/07/2023 12:05, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 14 20:57, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 14 14:04, Jon Turney wrote:
On 13/07/2023 19:53, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Nevertheless, I think this is ok to do. The description of pthread_cancel
contains this:
Asynchronous cancelability means
On 14/07/2023 14:04, Jon Turney wrote:
On 13/07/2023 19:53, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
normally after 10 seconds. (See the commentary in pthread::cancel() in
thread.cc, where it checks if the target thread is inside the kernel,
and silently converts the cancellation into a deferred one)
On Jul 14 20:57, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jul 14 14:04, Jon Turney wrote:
> > On 13/07/2023 19:53, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > > > Nevertheless, I think this is ok to do. The description of
> > > > > pthread_cancel
> > > > > contains this:
> > > > >
> > > > >Asynchronous cancelability
10 matches
Mail list logo
