Re: Patch to allow trailing dots on managed mounts

opinion in these issues (yet), but please look also at the related ending-colon ':extension' problem on NTFS. Such files are also not listed, but probably should be. listing ADS streams http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-11/msg00292.html -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/

Re: Patch to allow trailing dots on managed mounts

files for such attached ADS streams. -- Reini Urban

Re: [Fwd: [que_andrewBOOHyahoo.com: FOLLOWUP: 1.5.12: problems without registry keys]]

should release 1.5.13 soon. With the new process code? Is the exit status problem already solved? Haven't tested that. Pierre's unlink patch is also not integrated yet. Works fine for me. -- Reini Urban

Re: [PATCH] kill -f

between pids, gpids (i.e. negative pids) and Win9x pids. -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/

Re: [PATCH] kill -f

Pierre A. Humblet schrieb: Reini Urban wrote: Pierre A. Humblet schrieb: This patch allows kill.exe -f to deal with Win9x pids. Needs the bash internal also a patch like this? The bash internal doesn't kill Windows pids, neither on NT nor on 9X. I am not in favor of adding Windows specific

Re: [Patch] unlink

Pierre A. Humblet schrieb: It works on normal files. I haven't tested with the special names because I forgot how to create them ! Feedback welcome. works fine on w2k. attached is a test to create such files. unlink works fine on these. didn't test with wchar and unicode files yet, just char. but

sync() revised

I revised my sync() patch, which compiles and works. The assignment is on the way. Still didn't find any package which actually uses that. -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ 2004-10-29 Reini Urban [EMAIL PROTECTED] * syscalls.cc (sync): Implement it via cygheap-fdtab

Re: sync(3)

Christopher Faylor schrieb: On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 04:36:17AM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: Why is this a bad idea? It's a very limited implementation of what sync is supposed to do but maybe it's better than nothing. A slightly more robust method would be to implement an internal cygwin signal which

sync(3)

Why is this a bad idea? -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ 2004-10-27 Reini Urban [EMAIL PROTECTED] * syscalls.cc (sync): Implement it via cygheap-fdtab and FlushFileBuffers. Better than a noop. Index: syscalls.cc