Re: [PATCH] Cygwin: Interim malloc speedup

Hi Mark, On Jan 17 22:47, Mark Geisert wrote: > Hi Corinna, > Happy New Year back at you! I'm very glad to see you posting again! Yeah, I took a longer timeout over the holiday season. > Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-patches wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > > > Happy New Year! > > > > On Dec 21 20:53,

Re: [PATCH] Cygwin: Interim malloc speedup

Hi Corinna, Happy New Year back at you! I'm very glad to see you posting again! Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin-patches wrote: Hi Mark, Happy New Year! On Dec 21 20:53, Mark Geisert wrote: Replaces function-level lock with data-level lock provided by existing dlmalloc. Sets up to enable

Re: [PATCH] Cygwin: Interim malloc speedup

Hi Mark, Happy New Year! On Dec 21 20:53, Mark Geisert wrote: > Replaces function-level lock with data-level lock provided by existing > dlmalloc. Sets up to enable dlmalloc's MSPACES, but does not yet enable > them due to visible but uninvestigated issues. > > Single-thread applications may

Re: [PATCH] Cygwin: Interim malloc speedup -- addendum

I could easily provide an updated patch without the MSPACES stuff, given that that aspect is not really functional at this point. Just let me know. ..mark

[PATCH] Cygwin: Interim malloc speedup

Replaces function-level lock with data-level lock provided by existing dlmalloc. Sets up to enable dlmalloc's MSPACES, but does not yet enable them due to visible but uninvestigated issues. Single-thread applications may or may not see a performance gain, depending on how heavily it uses the