Re: [PATCH] Cygwin: fork: remember child as late as possible

On Apr 12 15:31, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > Otherwise, when the child does fail to reload dlls and terminates, we > produce a SIGCHILD signal, even if we did not succeed in starting up the > child process at all. Also, we would need to reap that child somewhere. I'm not that happy with the

[PATCH] Cygwin: fork: remember child as late as possible

Otherwise, when the child does fail to reload dlls and terminates, we produce a SIGCHILD signal, even if we did not succeed in starting up the child process at all. Also, we would need to reap that child somewhere. --- winsup/cygwin/fork.cc | 71 --- 1