Re: [PATCH] Proposed clarification of the snapshot installation FAQ

On Jan 13 00:01, Igor Peshansky wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Igor Peshansky wrote: > > > On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > > > Nevertheless, the advice about using "mv" to rename cygwin1.dll won't > > > work on every version of Windows and needs to be changed. > > > > Hmm, it's

Re: [PATCH] Proposed clarification of the snapshot installation FAQ

On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Igor Peshansky wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > Nevertheless, the advice about using "mv" to rename cygwin1.dll won't > > work on every version of Windows and needs to be changed. > > Hmm, it's worked for me on Win98, Win2k, and WinXP (though I sup

Re: [PATCH] Proposed clarification of the snapshot installation FAQ

On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 07:57:27PM -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: > >On 1/11/06, Igor Peshansky wrote: > >> As mentioned in , > >> here's a patch to the FAQ to clarify the section on installin

Re: [PATCH] Proposed clarification of the snapshot installation FAQ

On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 07:57:27PM -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote: >On 1/11/06, Igor Peshansky wrote: >> As mentioned in , >> here's a patch to the FAQ to clarify the section on installing snapshots. >> I didn't know whether the various *.texi

Re: [PATCH] Proposed clarification of the snapshot installation FAQ

On 1/11/06, Igor Peshansky wrote: > As mentioned in , > here's a patch to the FAQ to clarify the section on installing snapshots. > I didn't know whether the various *.texinfo files are still used, so I > ported the modifications there as well, jus

[PATCH] Proposed clarification of the snapshot installation FAQ

As mentioned in , here's a patch to the FAQ to clarify the section on installing snapshots. I didn't know whether the various *.texinfo files are still used, so I ported the modifications there as well, just in case. The ChangeLog is below.